Skip to main content
iRubric: SUST 401 Progress and Final Report Reflection rubric

iRubric: SUST 401 Progress and Final Report Reflection rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
SUST 401 Progress and Final Report Reflection 
SUST 401: Final Progress Report and Reflection
Rubric Code: YXB5824
By apatsun508
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Reflection  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
Enter rubric description
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Question A

What STARS category (team) did you participate in? Describe the project and/or the structure, functions, and goals of the category you worked in.
Poor

Did not describe project (overall and specific sub-section of STARS and the structure, functions, and goals of the department at RWU responsible for the area(s) reporting.
Fair

Incomplete description of project category (overall and specific sub-section of STARS and the structure, functions, and goals of the category.
Good

Clearly described the project components (overall and specific sub-section of STARS and the structure, functions, and goals of the category
Question B

What tasks have you performed so far for the project?
Poor

Did not describe individual tasks performed and specific contributions to the team.
Fair

Described, without sufficient evidence of tasks individually performed

Mostly described the groups, teams tasks.
Good

Described , with evidence (dates, people, purpose, etc) tasks individually performed.
Question C

How has your experiential project related to material discussed in class or covered in the annotated bibliographies? Which readings or concepts come to mind as you reflect on your experiential project?
Poor

no evidence of understanding how readings connect to concepts discussed.
Fair

readings mentioned without specifics.
Demonstrated some understanding and connection.
Good

Provides detailed examples related to specific readings, along with related class or group discussions. Goes beyond our class and makes connections to other classes, readings, discussions and events.
Question D

What have you learned so far from the project about yourself, your role in the community, and others?
Poor

only covers one category of learning
Fair

Good reflection on some of the learning categories, but does not cover all learning categories.
Good

Entry demonstrated deep reflection of learning so far from the project about yourself, your role in the community, and others?
Question E

How does this project relate to your own personal experiences, or professional / personal goals.
Poor

does not demonstrate connection between ppersonal experiences, or professional / personal goals and project
Fair

makes some connections superficially
Good

clearly understand and describes projects connection to personal experiences, or professional / personal goals.
Question F

Up to now, how has your experiences in this the project forced you to question your own assumptions, beliefs, or stereotypes?
Poor

no demonstration of self-awareness to personally held assumptions, beliefs, or stereotypes?
Fair

superficially mentions assumptions, beliefs, or stereotypes, but not aware of impact.
Good

demonstrates deep reflection of personally held assumptions, beliefs, and stereotypes and their impact on performance and understanding
Question G

What do you plan to do with the new skills/awareness acquired
Poor

does not demonstrate reflection on new skills/awareness acquired
Fair

not able to identify ways of applying skills/awareness gained.
Good

clearly identifies and describes new
skills/awareness acquired and where/how applied
Question H

How can you sustain an active role in communities throughout our lifetime? What are the challenges in doing so and how can/will deal with such challenges?
Poor

unable to clearly identify limiting challenges in sustaining an active role in communities, or how to sustain community engagement.
Fair

identifies challenges in sustaining an active role in communities but no reflection on how to deal with them
Good

demonstrates clarity about challenges and how to deal with them to insure sustained community engagement.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16