Skip to main content
iRubric: School District Budget rubric

iRubric: School District Budget rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
School District Budget 
School District Budget
NH Municipal Budget Law, preparing and analysis of a school district budget. Understanding of the process and negotiation of a final budget.
Rubric Code: YX83964
By valerienp
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Municipal Budgeting
  Outstanding

4 pts

Above Average

3 pts

Average

2 pts

Below Average

1 pts

Municipal Budget Law

Outstanding

A complete understanding of the Municipal Budget Law RSA 32. The process is appropriately followed without deterrence.
Above Average

Somewhat of an understanding of the Municipal Budget Law RSA 32. The process is followed with minor flaws. No redirection required.
Average

A cursory understanding of the Municipal Budget Law RSA 32. The process is followed somewhat with noticeable flaws. Little redirection required.
Below Average

A vague understanding of the Municipal Budget Law RSA 32. The process is not followed, the team/student required redirection.
Understand the budget

Outstanding

Each member of the team has undertaken a complete review of the budget presented. Pertinent clarifying questions are presented prior to negotiating the final budget.
Above Average

Each member of the team has undertaken a review of the budget presented. Questions are presented prior to the negotiation session.
Average

Each member of the team has undertaken a cursory review of the budget presented. Very few/if any clarifying questions are presented prior to the negotiation session. Foundation questions arise during the negotiation session.
Below Average

Team/student preparation is evident however some areas are missing or incomplete. Ideas are not connected to the budget presented.
Understand your role

Outstanding

The role of both teams is to propose the "prudent appropriation of public funds", showing the will of the majority. Team/student has prepared information and analysis for negotiation session. Members are active in the negotiation session.
Above Average

All members develop an understanding of their role as it pertains to the process. Team/student has prepared information and analysis for the negotiation session. Members support the actions and dicussions in the negotiation session.
Average

All members develop an understanding of their role as it pertains to the process. Team/student has prepared information and analysis for the negotiation session. Member did not contribute during the negotiation session.
Below Average

All members develop an understanding of their role as it pertains to the process. No information is prepared, however it is clear that sufficient analysis has been undertaken. Member contributed negatively during the negotiation session.
Exercise Diplomacy

Outstanding

The teams recognize the normalcy of differences of opinions. Teams have a productive debate and discussion on differences. A collaborative decision is made on the appropriations and estimated revenue to be presented to the voters.
Above Average

The teams recognize the normalcy of differences of opinions. Teams have a productive debate and discussion on differences. A final decision is made on the appropriations and estimated revenue to be presented to the voters. The estimated tax increase calculation is attempted without success.
Average

Some aspects of diplomacy were apparent. Members agreed to disagree, at points the teams did concur. A decision is made on the appropriations and estimated revenue to be presented to the voters. No estimated tax increase is presented.
Below Average

Members could not recognize the difference of opinions from the other team. Hard feelings were created that will extend beyond the budget season. No estimated tax increase is prepared.
Group member contribution

Outstanding

The group member contributed to the full development of the project. The member researched, brainstormed ideas, read and understood the budget and put their full effort into presenting ideas to the other team.
Above Average

The group member helped develop the whole project. By researching the document, brainstormed ideas, and working as a team to create a negotiation strategy, the group memeber contributed to the project.
Average

The group member became was successful in their own section which was assigned and combined their work with the other group members' work. The project came together successfully.
Below Average

The group member needed help with their assigned section. When asked to develop extra parts for the project, the member did not put forth full effort to complete the parts.





Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16