Skip to main content

iRubric: Character Trait Analysis rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Character Trait Analysis 
Rubric Code: YAW7XX
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Reading  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Character Analysis
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Content
20 %
Introduction

Excellent

Introduction includes brief overview of story and introduces character. Grabs the readers attention. Accurate thesis present.
Good

Introduction tells about character. Brief overview of story but does not flow together smoothly. Thesis present.
Fair

Introduction lacks overview and creativity. Attempt at thesis present.
Poor

Introduction very basic with no supporting information or evidence. No thesis present.
Conclusion

Excellent

Character interpretation is extended beyond explanation through detailed elaboration. A conclusion is made and explained sufficiently to connect character to plot. Thesis is restated in different words.
Good

Interpretation is extended through brief elaboration and connected to plot, but the explanation is unclear and difficult to understand. Thesis is restated in different words.
Fair

Interpretation is not extended beyond the explanation and support. The explanation is brief and insufficient to fully understand the connection. Thesis is restated in the same words.
Poor

Interpretation is not extended beyond the explanation and support. No connection is made to plot, or connection does not follow logically from character interpretation.
Thesis is not restated.
Body
70 %
Character Trait #1

Excellent

Interpretation of the character's traits are accurate and is based on logical and insightful textual references.
Good

Interpretation of the characer's traits are accurate and based on logical textual references
Fair

Interpretation of the character's traits are mostly accurate. Textual references may be based on insufficient textual references
Poor

Interpretation of the character's traits are inaccurate and based on random textual references
Evidence #1

Excellent

The evidence strongly and insightfully supports the interpretation. Evidence is clearly stated with textual support.
Good

The evidence accurately supports the interpretation, but not always clearly connected to the interpretation with textual support.
Fair

The evidence somewhat supports the interpretation and the connection to the interpretation is not always clear or textually supported.
Poor

The evidence does not clearly support the interpretation and are random or not included to support the interpretation and there is not textual support.
Character Trait #2

Excellent

Interpretation of the character's traits are accurate and is based on logical and insightful textual references.
Good

Interpretation of the characer's traits are accurate and based on logical textual references
Fair

Interpretation of the character's traits are mostly accurate. Textual references may be based on insufficient textual references
Poor

Interpretation of the character's traits are inaccurate and based on random textual references
Evidence #2

Excellent

The evidence strongly and insightfully supports the interpretation. Evidence is clearly stated with textual support.
Good

The evidence accurately supports the interpretation, but not always clearly connected to the interpretation with textual support.
Fair

The evidence somewhat supports the interpretation and the connection to the interpretation is not always clear or textually supported.
Poor

The evidence does not clearly support the interpretation and are random or not included to support the interpretation and there is not textual support.
Form
10 %
Mechanics/MLA format

Excellent

Fewer than three mechanical errors. All MLA format criteria met.
Good

Fewer than five mechanical errors. All MLA format criteria met.
Fair

Mechanical errors interfere with effectiveness of paper.
MLA format criteria used.
Poor

Mechanical errors interfere with readability of paper. Little or no MLA format criteria used.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243