- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Oedipus Rex rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Oedipus Rex Catcher Essay Essay on Oedipus Rex: Include and analyze at least one piece of evidence per body paragraph; includes proper MLA format Rubric Code: Y22BB3A By PVHarmon Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: 9-12

Oedipus Mid-Read
	100-90 (N/A)	89-80 (N/A)	79-70 (N/A)	>70/0 (N/A)
Introduction	100-90 Interesting Title, Interesting hook, begins outside of the book with interesting commentary	89-80 Title lacking (Oedipus essay, etc.)Hook attempted, mention of concept outside of book	79-70 Title Lacking, Hook repeats prompt, jumps into text	>70/0 No title, No hook, leads with text, leaves out title or author
Thesis/Topic sentence	100-90 Thesis and topic sentences are clear and specific to theme; interesting and well-written; thesis and topic sentences "match"	89-80 Thesis and topic sentences are clear and specific to theme; well-written and coherent; thesis and topic sentences match	79-70 Thesis and topic sentences are somewhat clear and connected to theme; thesis and two topic sentences do not "match"	>70/0 Thesis and topic sentences lack thematic point, clarity and direction and they do not "match"
Paragraph structure, Evidence	100-90 Smooth Transitions, well written. Evidence is relevant and specific, smoothly integrated, cited properly	89-80 Transitions, well written. Evidence is relevant and specific, smoothly integrated, cited properly	79-70 Transitions attempted but repetitive, fairly well written. Evidence might not be relevant orspecific, attempted integration, cited improperly	>70/0 No transitions, poorly written. Poor choice of (or no)evidence, No integration, not cited
Analysis of Evidence	100-90 Evidence is creatively explained in context (connects to topic sentence). Explanation is creative and logical.	89-80 Evidence explained in context (connects to topic sentence). Explanation is logical	79-70 Not all evidence explained in context (either paraphrased or content repeated)	>70/0 Evidence missing or does not connect . Commentary merely rewords evidence and/or is illogical
Mechanics	100-90 Minimal or no mechanical errors (spelling, punctuation, "bad words", no 1st or second person). Shows evidence of proofreading	89-80 Minimal mechanical errors. Uses 1-2 "bad words" No 1st or second person Shows some evidence of proofreading	79-70 Few mechanical errors that do not interfere with understanding. Uses 3-4 "bad words" Uses1st or second person Shows minimal evidence of proofreading	>70/0 Many mechanical errors that interfere with understanding. Uses 5+ "bad words" Multiple uses of 1st or second person Shows no evidence of proofreading