- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Video Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Video Presentation Video Presentation Rubric to evaluate student presentations that are video based. Rubric Code: Y22A39X By angelinapsy Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 9-12

Video Presentation Rubric Enter rubric description
	EXEMPLARY 25 pts	STRONG 20 pts	PROFICIENT 15 pts	DEVELOPING 10 pts
IDEAS & CONTENT	EXEMPLARY Program show a clear progression of ideas with excellent, well thought out explanations tying it together. Thought provoking, moving, focused and insightful. All points are supported well.	STRONG Format is clear, with ideas that do not surprise us, but are well thought out and supported. All required elements are present even if there is a problem with balance. Good detail and visuals.	PROFICIENT Clearly evident main ideas with some support, although we may feel we need more. Ideas are predictable, as are the visuals. The elements may be unbalanced; some required elements may be missing.	DEVELOPING Main ideas are simplistic; details are limited. May go off topic; be cliched. May be difficult to follow clearly or have no clear point. Poor quality.
ORGANIZATION	EXEMPLARY Compelling, creative, and logical. Has an inviting introduction and strong closure.	STRONG Format is clear, focused and logical, but not particularly creative. Intro is present and relevant, and it ends well.	PROFICIENT Format is acceptable, but not necessarily sequential or logically organized. Support may seem out of balance; it may seem hard to follow the presentation, or it is short, with limited visuals.	DEVELOPING Not organized presentation
CREATIVITY & DESIGN	EXEMPLARY Excellent use of camera and angles, with good focus and quality. Smooth transitions & clear reasons for each element. Elements are creative, unexpected and relevant.	STRONG Good use of graphics, etc. Sound quality is okay. Videos are clear, in focus and useful for the point.	PROFICIENT Limited use of graphical elements.	DEVELOPING Presentation were not presented graphically
ACTING	EXEMPLARY Well portrayal of characters. Convincing	STRONG Good portrayal of characters.	PROFICIENT Some of the actors were not able to portray their characters.	DEVELOPING Not convincing