Skip to main content

iRubric: Research Proposal rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Rubric Code: XXX3492
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Powered by iRubric Research Proposal
  Excellent

20 pts

Good

15 pts

Confusing

10 pts

Deficient

5 pts

Introduction

Excellent

Comprehensive review of the literature using quality evidence and specifically analyzes the research conducted by describing the individual studies and findings that support the thesis and focused problem. Hypotheses and objectives are very clear.
Good

Comprehensive review of the literature using quality evidence but does not adequately analyze the research findings; simply reports on the literature. Hypotheses and objectives are fairly clear.
Confusing

Superficial review of the literature that does not describe the research findings; relies heavily on a few studies and uses poor quality resources for information gathering. Hypotheses and objectives lack clarity.
Deficient

Superficial review of the literature that is poorly organized and lacks credibility based on the level of evidence and resources presented. Hypotheses and objectives are not stated.
Method

Excellent

Very clear description of all subsections (Participants, Materials, Procedure). Allows for study to easily be replicated.
Good

Fairly clear description of all subsections (Participants, Materials, Procedure). Allows for study to be replicated.
Confusing

Description of all subsections (Participants, Materials, Procedure) lack clarity. Makes it difficult to replicate the study.
Deficient

Missing description of one or more subsections (Participants, Materials, Procedure). Makes it impossible to replicate the study.
Data Analysis

Excellent

Very clear discussion of intended statistical analysis methods. Variables are thoroughly discussed.
Good

Fairly clear discussion of intended statistical analysis methods. Variables are discussed.
Confusing

Discussion of intended statistical analysis methods lacks clarity. Variables are not clearly discussed.
Deficient

Missing or incorrect selection statistical analysis. Variables are not discussed.
References Page

Excellent

Very well structured. 15 peer-reviewed journal articles.
Good

Well Structured. Minimum number of sources not met; 10-14 peer-reviewed journal articles.
Confusing

Fairly well structured. Minimum number of sources not met; 5-9 peer-reviewed journal articles.
Deficient

Missing or poorly structured. Minimum number of sources not met; 1-4 peer-reviewed journal articles
Appendices

Excellent

Very well written. Professional with no grammatical errors. Critical thought was put into the assessment tool.
Good

Well written. Professional but few grammatical errors. Thought was put into the assessment tool.
Confusing

Lacks professionalism; has several grammatical errors. Not much though was put into the assessment tool.
Deficient

Missing or very poorly written. Unprofessional with multiple grammatical errors. No thought was put into the assessment tool.



Keywords:
  • research proposal


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224