Skip to main content

iRubric: AP Spanish Lit Question #3- Single Text Analysis rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
AP Spanish Lit Question #3- Single Text Analysis 
AP Spanish Literature Single Text Analysis
Rubric Code: XXWC27A
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Foreign Languages  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Single Text Analysis
  Demonstrates Superiority

5 pts

Demonstrates Competence

4 pts

Suggests Competence

3 pts

Suggests Lack of Competence

2 pts

Demonstrates Lack of Competence

1 pts

Literary Features

Demonstrates Superiority

Effectively discusses a variety of rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text.
Demonstrates Competence

Discusses rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text
Suggests Competence

Describes some rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Identifies rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text, but they may not be relevant.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

May not identify rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text.
Cultural Analysis/Context

Demonstrates Superiority

Analyzes how cultural products, practices, or perspectives found in the text relate to the given cultural context
Demonstrates Competence

Explains how cultural products, practices, or perspectives found in the text relate to the given cultural context
Suggests Competence

Describes cultural products, practices, or perspectives of the given cultural context found in the text.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Identifies cultural products, practices, or perspectives of the given cultural context found in the text, but they may not be clear or relevant.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Demonstrates lack of understanding of the text, or cultural products, practices, or perspectives of the
given cultural context found in the text.
Literary Technique

Demonstrates Superiority

Analyzes how characteristics of the text represent the specified technique
Demonstrates Competence

Explains how characteristics of the text represent the specified technique
Suggests Competence

Describes characteristics of the text that represent the specified technique
Suggests Lack of Competence

Identifies characteristics of the text that represent the specified technique, but they may not be clear or relevant.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Demonstrates lack of understanding of characteristics of the text that represent the specified
technique
Textual Examples

Demonstrates Superiority

Supports analysis by integrating specific, well-chosen textual examples throughout the essay
Demonstrates Competence

Supports analysis with appropriate textual examples.
Suggests Competence

Elaborates on main points and supports observations with examples; however, the examples may not
always be clear and relevant. May contain some errors of interpretation, but errors do not detract from the overall quality of the essay
Suggests Lack of Competence

Presents main points and some details; describes basic elements of the text but may do so without
examples or supporting an argument. May contain some errors of interpretation that occasionally detract from the overall quality of the essay.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

May consist entirely of summary or paraphrasing of the text without examples relevant to the
technique or the given cultural context. May contain frequent errors of interpretation that significantly detract from the overall quality of the essay.
Organization

Demonstrates Superiority

Includes an explicit statement of purpose (thesis), a coherent structure, and a cohesive and logical
progression of ideas in a well-developed essay.
Demonstrates Competence

Includes an explicit statement of purpose (thesis), a coherent structure, and a logical progression of
ideas.
Suggests Competence

Includes a statement of purpose, evidence of organization (a stated topic, an introduction, a
conclusion), and a logical progression of ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence

May not clearly state a purpose or be organized around a central idea or argument; progression of
ideas may not be logical.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Does not state a purpose, show evidence of organization, or offer a progression of ideas.
Balance and Focus Notes

(Only used if there are balance issues in content.)

Demonstrates Superiority

A. If the essay has a significantly unbalanced focus on either the specified technique or the given cultural context and discusses rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features, the analysis must be good to earn a score
of 3.
Demonstrates Competence

B. If the essay has a balanced focus on both the specified technique and the cultural context but does not
discuss rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features, the analysis must be good to earn a score of 3.
Suggests Competence

C. If the essay focuses only on either the specified technique or the given cultural context and discusses
rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features, the analysis of either the specified technique or the given cultural context and the discussion of the rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features must be good to earn a
score of 3.
Suggests Lack of Competence

An essay that treats only the specified technique or the given cultural context without mentioning the
rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features cannot receive a score higher than 2.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

0: The response is so brief or so poorly written as to be meaningless, is not in Spanish, or is
otherwise off-task.
Note: An essay that merely restates part or all of the prompt or stimulus receives a score of 0. An essay that receives a 0 in content must also receive a 0 in language.
Language Use- Vocabulary

Demonstrates Superiority

Vocabulary is varied and appropriate to the text(s) being discussed, presents main ideas and supporting details, and communicates some nuances of meaning.
Demonstrates Competence

Vocabulary is appropriate to the text(s) being discussed, and presentsmain ideas and some supporting details.
Suggests Competence

Vocabulary is appropriate to the text(s) being discussed, but may be limited to presenting some relevant ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Vocabulary may be inappropriate to the text(s) being discussed, and forces the reader to supply inferences.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Vocabulary is insufficient and inappropriate to the text(s) being discussed; errors render comprehension difficult.
Language Use- Grammar

Demonstrates Superiority

Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is very good; use of verb tenses and moods is generally accurate; word order and formation are accurate; use of cohesive devices and transitional elements or both is appropriate to guide understanding.
Demonstrates Competence

Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is good; occasional errors in the use of verb tenses and moods do not detract from understanding; word order and formation are mostly accurate.
Suggests Competence

Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is adequate; errors in the use of verb tenses and moods may be frequent but do not detract from overall understanding; word order and formation are generally accurate.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is weak; errors in verb forms, word order, and formation are numerous and serious enough to impede comprehension at times.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is inadequate; errors in verb forms, word order, and formation are nearly constant and impede comprehension frequently.
Language Use- Writing Conventions

Demonstrates Superiority

Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation, paragraphing) are generally accurate; paragraphing shows grouping and progression of ideas.
Demonstrates Competence

Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation paragraphing) are generally accurate; occasional errors do not detract from understanding; paragraphing shows grouping and progression of ideas.
Suggests Competence

Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation, paragraphing) are sometimes accurate; numerous errors do not detract from overall understanding; paragraphing shows grouping of ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence

Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation, paragraphing) are generally inaccurate; errors are numerous and serious enough to impede comprehension at times; paragraphing may not show grouping of ideas.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence

Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation, paragraphing) are inaccurate; errors are nearly constant and impede comprehension frequently; there may be little or no evidence of paragraphing.



Keywords:
  • spanish literature text analysis


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243