Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: The Persuasive Debate rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
The Persuasive Debate
Speech to Persuade
Students will give a participate in a spoken question of value debate that follows either standard 2-on-2 or a Lincoln-Douglass debate. The format will go: Affirmative. Constructive: 4 min Negative C.E.: 2 min Negative Constructive.: 4 min Affirmative C.E.: 2 min Affirmative Rebuttal: 3 min Negative Rebuttal: 4 min Affirmative Rebuttal: 2 min
Rubric Code:
XX59C7A
By
RogueScholar
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Persuasive Speech Rubric
Exceptional
5 pts
Advanced
4 pts
Accomplished
3 pts
Developing
2 pts
Emerging
1 pts
Speech
Understanding of Topic
5 pts
Score:
Exceptional
The team extensively understood the topic in-depth and presented the information convincingly.
Advanced
The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and at times presented the information convincingly.
Accomplished
The team understood the topic in-depth and presented the information with ease.
Developing
The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with some efficiency.
Emerging
The team did not show an adequate understanding of the topic.
Opening Statement
5 pts
Exceptional
Opening statement clearly defines the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 3 major points in a clever and interesting way.
Advanced
Opening statement clearly defines the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 3 major points in a somewhat interesting way.
Accomplished
Opening statement attempts to clearly define the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists 2 major points.
Developing
Opening statement attempts to clearly define the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists 1 major points.
Emerging
Opening statement doesn't define the viewpoint and doesn't list major reasons.
Main Point #1
5 pts
Score:
Exceptional
Point #1 clearly expresses their viewpoint, including at least 3 details and examples to support their answer in a highly persuasive manner.
Advanced
Point #1 clearly expresses their viewpoint, including at least 3 details and examples to support their answer in a somewhat interesting way.
Accomplished
Point #1 attempts to clearly express their viewpoint, including only 2 details and examples to support their answer.
Developing
Point #1 attempts to clearly express their viewpoint, including only 1 detail and example to support their answer.
Emerging
Point #1 attempts to clearly express their viewpoint, including only no details or examples to support their answer.
Main Point #2
5 pts
Exceptional
Point #2 clearly expresses their viewpoint, including at least 3 details and examples to support their answer in a highly persuasive manner.
Advanced
Point #2 clearly expresses their viewpoint, including at least 3 details and examples to support their answer in a somewhat interesting way.
Accomplished
Point #2 attempts to clearly express their viewpoint, including only 2 details and examples to support their answer.
Developing
Point #2 attempts to clearly express their viewpoint, including only 1 detail and example to support their answer.
Emerging
Point #2 attempts to clearly express their viewpoint, including only no details or examples to support their answer.
Main Point #3
5 pts
Score:
Exceptional
Point #3 clearly expresses their viewpoint, including at least 3 details and examples to support their answer in a highly persuasive manner.
Advanced
Point #3 clearly expresses their viewpoint, including at least 3 details and examples to support their answer in a somewhat interesting way.
Accomplished
Point #3 attempts to clearly express their viewpoint, including only 2 details and examples to support their answer.
Developing
Point #3 attempts to clearly express their viewpoint, including only 1 detail and example to support their answer.
Emerging
Point #3 attempts to clearly express their viewpoint, including only no details or examples to support their answer.
Concluding Statement
5 pts
Exceptional
Concluding statement clearly sums up the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 3 major points in a clever and interesting way.
Advanced
Concluding statement clearly sums up the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists their 3 major points in a somewhat interesting way.
Accomplished
Concluding statement attempts to clearly sum up the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists 2 major points.
Developing
Concluding statement attempts to clearly sum up the viewpoint of the team and briefly lists 1 major point.
Emerging
Concluding statement doesn't sum up the viewpoint and doesn't list major reasons.
Rebuttal
5 pts
Exceptional
All counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Was able to accurately defend position.
Advanced
Majority of counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Was able to defend position.
Accomplished
Half of counter-arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Was able to defend position.
Developing
Some of counter arguments were accurate, relevant and strong. Was somewhat able to defend position.
Emerging
Counter-arguments were not accurate and/or relevant. Was unable to defend position.
Outline
Format & Works Cited Page
5 pts
Exceptional
The outline employs the correct format, and proper use of symbols, and indentations are
evident.
Advanced
The outline employs the correct format, and proper use of symbols, and indentations are
evident.
Accomplished
The outline shows the correct format, though proper symbols
and indentations may be misplaced or inconsistent.
Developing
The outline resembles the correct format, but proper symbols and indentations are not used.
Emerging
The outline has serious errors and does not use the correct format.
Content
5 pts
Exceptional
The outline contains very
precise, detailed information
that is essential to the topic, in
addition to including specific
anecdotes and quotations
which are attributed to sources
with proper MLA
parenthetical documentation.
Advanced
The outline contains some
precise, detailed information
that is essential to the topic, in
addition to including quotations
which are attributed to sources
with proper MLA
parenthetical documentation.
Accomplished
The outline contains sufficient
information of the topic which
is attributed to sources with
proper MLA parenthetical
documentation though one or two errors may appear.
Developing
The outline includes
information related to the
topic, but does not elaborate or
expand upon essential
information which is
attributed the sources but does
not use proper MLA
parenthetical documentation.
Emerging
The outline includes
insufficient and/or
inappropriate information and
does not include any
attribution to sources in MLA
format or otherwise.
Thesis
5 pts
Exceptional
Thesis is clear and proposes an arguable point which people could reasonably agree or disagree; it takes a stand.
Advanced
Thesis is clear and proposes an arguable point, but it does not take a clear stand.
Accomplished
Thesis is somewhat clear and does not fully propose an arguable point.
Developing
Thesis is not clear and lacks organization of an arguable point and a clear stand for or against.
Emerging
The thesis is absent from the outline.
Performance
Body Language
5 pts
Score:
Exceptional
All body language showed enthusiasm: stood straight, hand gestures emphasized, facial expressions matched speech mood.
Movements seem fluid and help the audience visualize.
Advanced
Stood straight, appropriate hand gestures, appropriate facial expressions.
Made movements or gestures that enhances articulation.
Accomplished
Stood straight, little facial expression, hand gestures distracting.
Some movement or descriptive gestures.
Developing
Some slouched, blank facial expression, fidgeting.
Minimal movement or descriptive gestures.
Emerging
Slouched, blank facial expression, fidgeting.
No movement or descriptive gestures.
Eye Contact
5 pts
Score:
Exceptional
Speaker rarely refers to notes. Makes sustained eye contact with all members of the audience.
Advanced
Speaker maintains inconsistent eye contact with the audience or focuses on one person/part of the audience, ignoring the rest.
Accomplished
Speaker frequently refers to notes and makes little eye contact with the audience.
Developing
Speaker reads the speech and/or rarely looks at the audience.
Emerging
Speaker made no eye contact with the audience at all.
Voice
5 pts
Score:
Exceptional
Effective volume, diction, rate, and expression were used.
Appropriate pauses were used.
Uses a clear voice and correct pronunciation of terms so that audience members can hear presentation.
Advanced
Could be heard clearly. Good expression and rate.
Varied voice and pace.
Voice is clear, pronounces most words correctly, and audience members can hear presentation.
Accomplished
Could be heard some of the time or somewhat difficult to understand. Little expression.
Voice is low, incorrectly pronounces terms, and audience has difficulty hearing presentation.
Developing
Difficult to hear or understand.
No expression in voice.
Mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for a majority of students to hear.
Emerging
Monotone and/or mumbling. The audience's attention is constantly elsewhere
Respect for the Other Team
5 pts
Exceptional
All statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Never interrupted or talked over other team members.
Advanced
Most statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Never interrupted or talked over other team members.
Accomplished
Most statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Seldom interrupted or talked over other team members.
Developing
Few statements and responses were respectful and appropriate. Seldom interrupted or talked over other team members.
Emerging
Statements and responses were consistently not respectful. Consistently interrupted other team or talked over other team members.
Keywords:
persuasive speech, presentation, debate
Subjects:
Communication
English
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n98
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.