iRubric: Grant Proposal Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Grant Proposal Project

Select one of the two suggested grant opportunities, develop an idea, and submit a grant proposal. Prepare a brief oral presentation focused on soliciting administrative support.

Rubric Code: XX4AWX8

By ecruz004

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Graduate

Grant Proposal
	Poor (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Excellent (N/A)
Needs Assessment Grant narrative & appendices reflect a well thought out, well executed, and thoughtfully applied needs assessment process. Assessment process and results are clearly and fully described. Assessment includes a variety of levels of the assessment process (macro to micro); and multiple data sources and types	Poor Needs assessment is incomplete or it inaccurately reflects the nature and needs of the community agency.	Fair Needs assessment is incompletely articulated; it does not fully capture the mission or culture of the agency.	Good Needs assessment is completed and comprehensive in terms of levels of assessment.	Excellent Needs assessment is completed and comprehensive in terms of all levels of assessment. It is professional, clear & concise, and engaging to soundly convince readers of agency needs.
Project Purpose The project purpose is clear and benefits the community agency.	Poor The purpose of the project is unclear.	Fair The project purpose is clear but the project is of little benefit to the agency	Good The project purpose is clear and clearly ties to the needs of the community agency.	Excellent The project purpose is clear and clearly ties to the needs of the community agency. It is creative and provides a unique occupational therapy specific contribution.
Project Goals & Objectives The project goals & objectives are well stated and can be implemented within the time lines of the grant proposal. Goals focus on intended outcome of the project; objectives are measurable and include an appropriate time frame. Objectives are NOT process only.	Poor The project goals & obj are stated and/or it can not be implemented within the time lines of the grant proposal.	Fair The project goals & obj are incompletely stated and/or may lack fit with the time lines of the grant proposal.	Good The project goals & obj are stated. Goals & objectives are simple; indirect measures; or lacking in direct fit with program plans.	Excellent The project goals & obj are well stated, are a tight fit with program plans, and can be implemented within the time lines of the grant proposal.
Project Design/Theoretical Foundati The OT and/or HP theoretical foundation of the program is described clearly to a non-OT audience. The choice of guiding theory(ies) is sound. The design of the project is sound and appropriate in terms of: - theoretical foundation (it is properly guided by this theory) - resources available for project completion (time, $$, staff, space, etc.) - safety awareness Dissemination Plan is sound and clear	Poor The theoretical support and/or design of the project is questionable. Resources are identified for its completion may available.	Fair The theoretical support and/or design of the project are described but not cohesive. Resources are not fully identified for its completion.	Good The theoretical support and/or design of the project are sound and appropriate resources are identified for its completion.	Excellent The theoretical support and/or design of the project are realistic and appropriate resources are identified for its completion. It is creative, reflects the unique contribution of OT, and clearly meets an identified need of the agency.
Program Evaluation Evaluation plans for the processes and outcomes of the grant are clear and realistic for the community agency and the aims of this grant.	Poor Evaluation Plans lack inclusion of key criteria. Plan is incomplete or it lacks specificity.	Fair Evaluation Plans lack inclusion of some criteria. Plan is incomplete or it lacks specificity.	Good Evaluation Plans includes all criteria and is specific enough to be able to be implemented by an outside participant (the reader).	Excellent Evaluation Plans includes all criteria and is specific enough to be able to be implemented by an outside participant (the reader). It is written in a logical format that reflects the student's understanding of the evaluation process. It is clear & concise.
Budget The line item budget includes detailed descriptions of items, costs, and materials/labor donated to the project.	Poor The line item budget does not include detailed descriptions of items, costs, and materials/labor donated to the project.	Fair The line item budget includes incomplete descriptions of items, costs, and/or materials/labor donated to the project.	Good The line item budget includes all detailed descriptions of items, costs, and materials/labor donated to the project.	Excellent The line item budget includes all detailed descriptions of items, costs, and materials/labor donated to the project. It is well organized, clear & concise. It reflects the mission of the project and the community agency.
OT Curriculum The description and presentation of OT intervention plan and materials are appropriate, based on theory, goals and objectives, and are in user-friendly format appropriate for the site to use after OT services have been completed.	Poor OT curriculum is incomplete, inadequately described, and/or does not reflect a unique contribution of OT in this setting.	Fair OT curriculum is somewhat complete, inadequately described, and/or does not reflect a unique contribution of OT in this setting.	Good The description and presentation of OT intervention plan and materials are appropriate, based on theory, goals and objectives, and are in a format acceptable for the site to use after OT services have been completed.	Excellent The description and presentation of OT intervention plan and materials are appropriate, based on theory, goals and objectives, and are in user-friendly format appropriate for the site to use after OT services have been completed. The OT intervention is creative and is not unique. It is detailed enough to guide a non-OT leader in its enactment, with solid reliability.
Written presentation (Form) Grant is written using appropriate grammar, writing style, & APA format.	Poor	Fair	Good	Excellent
Grant guidelines The grant guidelines were followed correctly, completely and the documents prepared for submission were neat with correct spelling and grammar.	Poor The instructions given in the grant were not followed. Submission contained errors in spelling and grammar.	Fair Some elements required by the grant were missing, incomplete, or incorrect. Submission contained some errors.	Good 1 element required by the grant was missing, incomplete, or incorrect. Submission contained some errors.	Excellent All requirements of the grant were met in the proposal. No details or information were missing. The submission was neat and spelling and grammar were correct.

Keywords:

Portage Lake, Maine

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric