iRubric: Wiki Rubric for a collaborative research project

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Wiki Rubric for a collaborative research project

This is a rubric for marking the semester long Sophomore Research Project

Rubric Code: X7X624

By creativeproject

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Project

Grade Levels: (none)

Wiki
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Wiki Content
Content	Poor Minimal or missing content, 3 or more factual errors. No details or examples.	Fair Demonstrates essentialknowledge however contains 1 -2 factual errors. Very few details or examples.	Good Demonstrates essential knowledge with no factual errors. Some details and examples.	Excellent Demonstrates in-depth knowledge. Many details and examples.
Organization	Poor Content has no logical organization.	Fair Content has some logical organization.	Good Content uses headings or bulleted lists to organize topics.	Excellent Content uses headings or bulleted lists to organize topis and group related material.
Creativity	Poor Uses the ideas of others and provides no original input.	Fair Minor evidence of original thinking.	Good Shows evidence of some critical thought.	Excellent Many original ideas linked to topic and material.
Citation	Poor Copies material without citing sources.	Fair Does not give credit to most sources. Uses improper format for citing sources.	Good Gives credit to most sources. Uses proper format for citing format with minor errors. Some resources are referred to with hyperlinks.	Excellent Gives credit to all sources. Uses proper format for citing sources. Uses hyperlinks to resources to help reader.
Accuracy	Poor Four or more errors in spelling or grammar. Constant use of inappropriate abbreviations. More than one broken link.	Fair Three errors in spelling or grammar. Some use of inappropriate abbreviations. One broken link.	Good One or two errors in spelling or grammar. No use of inappropriate abbreviations. No broken links.	Excellent No misspellings or grammatical errors and no use of inappropriate abbreviations. No broken links.
Collaboration
Contribution	Poor Does not collect material or develop ideas on topic. No contribution or minimal input to development of wiki.	Fair Minimal collection of material or development of ideas on topic. Moderate input to development of wiki.	Good Basic collection of material or development of ideas on topic. Adequate input to development of wiki.	Excellent Collects a great deal of information and develops own ideas on topic. Constant input to development of wiki.
Authorship	Poor Does not create any pages or edit anyone else's page.	Fair Creates one page of content. Only submits one changes to other pages.	Good Creates two pages of content. Makes changes to two to three other pages.	Excellent Creates more than two pages of content. Makes changes to more than three other pages.
Discussion	Poor Does not participate in discussions about the content and organization of the wiki.	Fair Participates in very few discussions about the content and organization of the wiki.	Good Participates in discussions about the content and organization of the wiki.	Excellent Participates in discussions about the content and organization of the wiki with thoughtful and creative ideas.
Timing	Poor Contributions in terms of research materials, content, and discussions are often out of sync with the group's schedule or pace.	Fair Timing of the contributions in terms of research materials, content, and discussions are sometimes helpful to the group.	Good Provides timely contributions in terms of research materials, content, and discussions.	Excellent Consistently provides timely contributions in terms of research materials, content, and discussions, that encourages and facilitates the whole group's progress.

Keywords:

wiki

Subjects:

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric