iRubric: GIS Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

GIS Rubric

to be used with maps and questions from Arcmap.

Rubric Code: X77C3B

By CulturalGeoMan

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Geography

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Arcmap Enter rubric description
	Poor 5 pts	Fair 8 pts	Good 13 pts	Excellent 15 pts
Data Preparation Did the student obtain the correct data for the analysis and contact of the project.	Poor Data was not completed and did not represent the analysis project.	Fair Data was somewhat helpful but need more explanation in displaying.	Good Some data was used correctly but either needed additional or less than what was displayed.	Excellent All data displayed and used appropriately and documented sources.
Content Have the analysis answers been written in detail with accuracy and insight?	Poor Answers show limited detail, accuracy and insight.	Fair Answers show some detail, accuracy and insight.	Good Answers show considerable detail, accuracy and insight.	Excellent Answers show a high degree of detail, accuracy and insight.
Map Organization Has the map been designed in an organized manner?	Poor The organization of the map is displayed with limited effectiveness.	Fair The organization of the map shows some effectiveness.	Good Map is displayed and organized in an effective manner.	Excellent There is a high degree of effectiveness in the organization.
Map Technology Has the student exhibited an ability to use the software to achieve the desired results?	Poor Exhibits no command of the software and is able to use it with limited effectiveness.	Fair Exhibits satisfactory command of the software and is able to use it with some effectiveness.	Good Exhibits good command of the software and is able to use it effectively.	Excellent Exhibits a high degree of ability in the use of the software.
Map Application Does the layout contain all the necessary cartographic elements?	Poor The layout is missing several elements. These may include a legend, compass, title etc.	Fair The layout is missing one or two of the following: a legend, compass, title etc.	Good The layout is designed with effectiveness and includes necessary cartographic elements.	Excellent The layout contains all necessary elements and is designed with a high degree of effectiveness.
Documentation The student should include all information in the process to recreate the data result in sequence.	Poor The documentation was difficult to understand and not able to produce the project that was submitted.	Fair The step by step instructions lacked detail or enough information to clear for the process taken	Good The documentation was able to be followed with minimum effort. Some details were missing.	Excellent The included documentation was consise, detailed and useable to create a duplicate process.
Analysis Uses ArcMap analysis tools to present the documentation, presentation materials and map.	Poor The documentation was difficult to understand and no advance tools were used in preperation.	Fair Documentation was able to be followed but only some tools taught in class were used.	Good Documenation was good and several tools taught in class were used.	Excellent Excellend documenation and reasoning were demonstrated and advanced tools learned by student were used.
Work Ethic Demonstation of work in and out of class and progression shown.	Poor Student showed no continual progress and project was "put" together at the last minute.	Fair Student showed some progression but wasted time in class.	Good Student showed gradual progression to meet requirements of project.	Excellent Student showed time spent in and out of class. Student was organized and used time to enhance their analysis.

Subjects:

Geography

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric