iRubric: Grant Proposal Project-Community Nutrition rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Grant Proposal Project-Community Nutrition

Complete a community nutrition needs assessment, design a program or intervention and complete AGM Grant Proposal Documents.

Rubric Code: X63977

By dlgleg

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Grant Proposal
	Poor 5 pts	Fair 10 pts	Good 12.5 pts
Cover Sheet Provides accurate contact information, organizational information, and request information clear and accurate	Poor More than one of the three sections is inaccurate or incomplete..	Fair One of the three sections is inaccurate or incomplete.	Good The cover sheet is filled out appropriately in a clear and accurate manner..
Letter of Intent Includes description of the idea or project, indications of how the project connects to the grant maker's area of interest, indication of who would be responsible for managing the project, including potential collaborators, as estimate of project cost you will be requesting. Should be 1-2 pages	Poor More than one of the four areas is not included. Poor grammar noted. Too long or too short.	Fair Mising one of the four areas. Grammar ans style are adequate.	Good The letter is the appropriate length, includes all 4 elements, has corect grammar and good style.
Full Proposal Narrative Form Demonstrates the commitment of your organization and uniqueness in your proposal. Brief, but thorough. Cites relevant data and acknowleges similar programs. Goals and Objectives are measurable. Needs assessment and program components are included with appropriate references.	Poor More than one section is incomplete. Inadequate research and substantial lack of APA format noted. There is little development of needs assessment and program components.	Fair One section is incomplete. APA format is mostly correct. Needs assessment and program components are not fully developed.	Good All sections complete without exceeding 8 pages single spaced. APA format is completely correct. Proposal has a logical flow. Needs assessment and program components complete
Diversity Data Form Data researched and included that addresses present or future plans	Poor No provisions for diversity have been made.	Fair The form is incomplete.	Good The form is complete and currently has or plans to have a diverse work force.
Detailed Budget The line item budget includes detailed descriptions of items, costs, and materials/labor donated to the project.	Poor The line item budget does not include detailed descriptions of items, costs, and materials/labor donated to the project.	Fair The line item budget includes incomplete descriptions of items, costs, and/or materials/labor donated to the project.	Good The line item budget includes all detailed descriptions of items, costs, and materials/labor donated to the project.
Evaluation There is a plan for formative, summative, and impact evaluation. Written in Appendix A.	Poor Only one form of evaluation is addressed or there is little detail on how evaluation will be carried out.	Fair Missing one form of evaluation. Plan for carrying out evaluation is unclear.	Good There is a clear plan ofr formative, summative, and impact evaluation with specifics.
Supporting Data All budget dollars have supporting data in Appendix B.	Poor Lacking supportive budget data for more than one line item.	Fair Lacking supportive budget datat for one line item.	Good Supporting data for each line item is included in the Appendix B.
Assembly of the Final Product The final project is typed, neat, organized, and grammatically correct. APA format is used and Appendices are labeled appropriately.	Poor Project is not typed. APA format incorrect.	Fair Project is typed but contains more than one spelling or grammar errors. Not assembled in logical order.	Good Final project is neat, organized, less than one spelling or grammar error. Assebled correctly. Neatly typed.

Keywords:

Portage Lake, Maine

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric