iRubric: Evaluating WebQuests rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Evaluating WebQuests

The WebQuest format can be applied to a variety of teaching situations. If you take advantage of all the possibilities inherent in the format, your students will have a rich and powerful experience. This rubric will help you pinpoint the ways in which your WebQuest isn't doing everything it could do. (Note: this rubric is done during a hands on traning from a rubric at SDSU).

Rubric Code: X5W8AX

By menzel

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Project

Grade Levels: (none)

Evaluating WebQuests Enter rubric description
	Undeveloped F 2.5 pts	Needs Improvement D 5 pts	Satisfactory C 7.5 pts	Good B 10 pts	Excellent A 12.5 pts
Overall Aesthetics This refers to the WebQuest page itself, not the external resources linked to it.
Overall Visual Appeal & Legibility 12.5 pts	Undeveloped The questions are not comprehendible and incorrect grammar is used.	Needs Improvement Over 75% of the questions are not comprehendible and a lot of grammar mistakes.	Satisfactory 50% of the questions are comprehendible and some grammar mistakes.	Good Almost all of the questions were comprehendible and there were few to any grammar mistakes.	Excellent All questions were perfectly composed.
Navigation & Flow 12.5 pts	Undeveloped The answers were not on the given web page.	Needs Improvement Getting through the lesson is confusing and unconventional. Pages can't be found easily.	Satisfactory There are a few places where the learner can get lost and not know where to go next.	Good There are 0-1 places where the learner can get lost and not know where to go next.	Excellent Navigation is seamless. It is always clear to the learner what all the pieces are and how to get to them.
Mechanical Aspects 12.5 pts	Undeveloped None of the links work.	Needs Improvement There are more than 5 broken links.	Satisfactory There are some(less than 5) broken links.	Good There are 1-3 broken links.	Excellent No mechanical problems noted. All links worked.
Task The task is the end result of student efforts... not the steps involved in getting there.
Connection of Task to Standards 12.5 pts	Undeveloped The task is not related to standards.	Needs Improvement The task only has a few questions related to the subject and is not connected to what the students must know to achieve proficiency of those standards.	Satisfactory The task is referenced to standards but is not clearly connected to what students must know and be able to do to achieve proficiency of those standards.	Good Most of the questions are referenced to standards and is clearly connected to what students must know and be able to do to achieve proficiency of those standards.	Excellent The task is referenced to standards and is clearly connected to what students must know and be able to do to achieve proficiency of those standards.
Process The process is the step-by-step description of how students will accomplish the task.
Clarity of Process 12.5 pts	Undeveloped Process is not clearly stated. Students would not know what they were supposed to do just from reading the directions.	Needs Improvement Very few directions are given, and there is missing information. Students might be confused.	Satisfactory Some directions are given, but there is missing information. Students might be confused.	Good Most of the directions are given, there is little missing information.	Excellent Every step is clearly stated. Students will know exactly where they are at each step of the process and know what to do next.
Richness of Process 12.5 pts	Undeveloped Few steps, no separate roles assigned.	Needs Improvement	Satisfactory Some separate tasks or roles assigned. More complex activities required.	Good	Excellent Different roles are assigned to help students understand different perspectives and/or share responsibility in accomplishing the task.
Resources Note: you should evaluate all resources linked to the page, even if they are in sections other than the Process block. Also note that books, video and other off-line resources can and should be used where appropriate.
Resources 12.5 pts	Undeveloped Website is not credible.	Needs Improvement Most of the website is not credible.	Satisfactory Some of the website is credible.	Good Most of the website is credible.	Excellent All of the website is credible.
Evaluation
Clarity of Evaluation Criteria 12.5 pts	Undeveloped Criteria for success are not described.	Needs Improvement Criteria for success is described, but not comprehendible.	Satisfactory Criteria for success are at least partially described.	Good Criteria for success is mostly described.	Excellent Criteria for success are clearly stated.

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric