iRubric: Website Reaction Paper Rubric

There is little or no evidence of the candidate having conducted a thorough examination of 2 websites.
Little or no examples of the content or information presented on the websites.
The reaction paper includes a limited amount of information or commentary about the layout, features, usability, and target audience of the websites.

There is some evidence of the candidate having conducted a thorough examination of 2 websites.
Candidate provides an adequate description of the content & information presented on the websites.
The reaction paper includes a sufficient amount of information and simplistic commentary about the layout, features, usability, and target audience of the websites.

There is clear and ample evidence of the candidate having conducted a thorough examination of 2 websites.
Candidate provides a detailed and comprehensive description of the content & information presented on the websites.
The reaction paper includes an ample amount of information and sophisticated commentary about the layout, features, usability, and target audience of the websites.

Little or no evidence of a critical analysis of the websites.
There is little or no evidence of the candidate’s opinions/insights about the websites.
The paper involves only a cursory review of the websites, without providing more in depth analysis in which connections are made between content presented on websites to broader issues & information statements without providing specific examples or rationale to support opinions or rationale.

Limited evidence of a critical analysis of the websites.
Adequate evidence of the candidate’s opinions/insights about the websites is presented.
The paper involves a satisfactory review of the websites, and includes some analysis in which connections are made between content presented on the websites to broader issues & information related to ASDs.
The paper includes several specific examples or rationale to support opinions, insights, & analyses.

Clear evidence of a critical analysis of the websites is provided.
There is ample evidence of the candidate’s opinions/insights provided in the reflection paper.
Candidate makes clear and insightful connections between content presented on the websites to the broader issues & information related to ASDs.
The paper includes specific examples and rationale to support opinions, insights, & analyses.