iRubric: Final Oral Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Final Oral Presentation

Legal Issues Song Presentation

Oral/Visual Presentation and Paper

Rubric Code: X245W94

By naromoreno

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Law

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: 9-12, Undergraduate

Final Presentation Rubric
	Needs Support 4 pts	Developing 6 pts	Proficient 8 pts	Advanced 10 pts
Organization / Clarity	Needs Support The subject matter of the presentation cannot be understood and easily identified.	Developing The subject matter of the presentation has difficulty being understood and easily identified.	Proficient The subject matter of the presentation is adequately understood and easily identified.	Advanced The subject matter of the presentation is completely understood and identified.
Subject Knowledge	Needs Support The Presenter does not have grasp of the historical information they are presenting.	Developing The Presenter somewhat has a grasp of the historical information they are presenting.	Proficient The Presenter mostly has a grasp of the historical information they are presenting.	Advanced The Presenter clearly has a grasp of the historical information they are presenting.
Presentation	Needs Support Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear. Presentation is either much too short or much too long.	Developing Student's voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation. Presentation is too short or too long.	Proficient Student's voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation. Presentation is a little too short or a little too long.	Advanced Student uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation. Presentation is 5-6 minutes in length.
Analysis/Comparison	Needs Support Clearly has little to no experience listening. Less than 2 examples given, examples are not specific.	Developing Clearly has some experience listening. At least 3 examples given, examples are somewhat specific.	Proficient Clearly has much experience listening. At least 4-5 examples given, examples are moderately specific.	Advanced Clearly has expertise. More than 5 examples given, examples are very specific.
Quality of Opinion/Argument	Needs Support Argument is not clear, logical and does not use knowledge of copyright law and the specifics of the legal action to make its claims.	Developing Argument is somewhat clear, logical and uses little knowledge of copyright law and the specifics of the legal action to make its claims.	Proficient Argument is mostly clear, logical and uses knowledge of copyright law and the specifics of the legal action to make its claims.	Advanced Argument is clear, logical and uses knowledge of copyright law and the specifics of the legal action to make its claims.

Keywords:

History

Subjects:

Types:

Presentation

Discuss this rubric