Skip to main content
iRubric: 7PY023 EBR rubric

iRubric: 7PY023 EBR rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
7PY023 EBR 
EBP Paper
The EBP paper provides students with an opportunity to research and develop an in-depth understanding of a key practice or policy question. This includes an integrated critical appraisal of the scholarly literature that demonstrates an understanding of diverse research methodologies and findings, and the ability to synthesize and draw one's own conclusions about the status of practice or policy in a selected area.
Rubric Code: WX94973
By u22052
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Pharmacy  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric EBR Paper
  Minimally Fulfilled

1 pts

Partially Fulfilled

2 pts

Mostly Fulfilled

3 pts

Fully Fulfilled

5 pts

Introduction
5 %

Minimally Fulfilled

The paper states and identifies the main question, but does not explain why or how it is a problem or question.
Represents the issues accurately and appropriately
Partially Fulfilled

The paper identifies the main question and subsidiary aspects of a question.
Articulates an understanding of the scope of the problem and the related issue(s) involved.
Mostly Fulfilled

the paper articulates some understanding of the scope of the problem and issues involved.
Identifies at least one embedded or implicit issue and addresses its relationship to the issue.
Fully Fulfilled

The paper articulates a thorough understanding of the scope of the problem and issue(s) involved.
Identifies multiple embedded or implicit issues, addressing their relationships to the paper.
Systematic Search
5 %

EBP systematic search procedure is evaluated here- you are to conduct an efficient search using multiple scholarly databases. FINAL, specific search terms, combining strategy, and databases queried must be included in the text Students are welcome to append a more detailed search strategy, but are not required to do so.
Minimally Fulfilled

Discussed the rationale but did not discuss the data collection specifics or vice versa
Partially Fulfilled

Discussed the rationale and most of the data collection specifics (i.e. key terms, moles, databases, years included, additional inclusion and exclusion criteria)
Mostly Fulfilled

Discussed the rationale and all of the data collection specifics, some of the appraisal tools
Fully Fulfilled

Discussed the rationale and all of the data collection specifics, the appraisal tools and analysis strategies
appraising research found
30 %

Your ability to appraise and synthesize the research literature is evaluated here- you are to identify and appraise the best available research. This section should be a synthesis rather than a laundry list of studies. The idea here is to communicate methodological quality rather than a simple score on one of these tools. That is, describe why a study is of high or low quality, and do so in such a way that a lay person can understand.
Minimally Fulfilled

Captures mostly appropriate evidence but does not consistently apply relevant thinking (e.g. comparing, classifying, abstracting, analyzing, summarizing) in presenting the various evidence
Partially Fulfilled

Applies relevant thinking some of the time specifically 1) can classify the literature but does not adequately analyze or summarize the main themes in presenting the literature; 2) Does not integrate the appraisal system for the literature 3) can classify the main themes of the stakeholders/consumers
Mostly Fulfilled

Applies relevant thinking skills in presenting all of the evidence.
Can classify the literature and adequately summarizes the main themes in the presenting the literature
Minimally communicates the results of the appraisal system for the literature
Can classify the main themes of the stakeholders/consumers
Fully Fulfilled

Applies relevant thinking skills in presenting information.
Integrates the results of the appraisal systems used to evaluate the rigor of the research literature with the classification/organizing themes of research literature most of the time.
Can classify the main themes of the stakeholders/consumers
Preliminary evaluation plan
30 %

Your ability to develop and describe a reasonable evaluation plan is evaluated here: Set up a preliminary evaluation plan for your particular intervention.
Minimally Fulfilled

No objectives listed.
Measures were not sed or developed or were inadequate.
No direct measures were included in the plan.
Participants were not
identified.
The timeframe was not specified.
Partially Fulfilled

Measures were not used or developed or were inadequate.
No direct measures
were included in the
plan.
Mostly Fulfilled

Not all of the
objectives stated in
measurable terms.
The timeframe was
specified, but not for
others or there was some lack of clarity.
Fully Fulfilled

Objectives stated in terms of measurable
knowledge, behaviour,
attitude, or disposition.
More than one appropriate measure was used for each objective.
Participants were
identified for each objective.
The timeframe for
administration of
measures or collectio
Evidence of your understanding
10 %

Evidence of your understanding of the relevant literature and major concepts for your selected question.
Minimally Fulfilled

Applies relevant thinking skills (e.g. comparing, classifying, abstraction, analyzing, criticizing) in presenting information but without clear reference to context, assumptions, data, and evidence.
Partially Fulfilled

Applies relevant thinking skills (e.g. comparing, classifying, abstracting, analyzing, criticizing, evaluating) in presenting information with reference to context, assumptions, data, and evidence.
Suggests implications and consequences but without development.
Mostly Fulfilled

Applies relevant thinking skills (e.g. comparing, classifying, abstracting, analyzing, criticizing, evaluating) in presenting information with reference to context, assumptions, data, and evidence.
Identifies and clearly discusses at least one implication and consequence by considering at least one various relevant assumption, context, datum, and evidence.
Fully Fulfilled

Applies relevant thinking skills in presenting information.
Identifies and clearly discusses multiple implications and consequences by considering various relevant assumptions, contexts, data, and evidence.
Draws conclusions based on reasons, arguments, and evidence
Recommendations
10 %

Your ability to integrate research into high quality practice and policy recommendations is evaluated here: Integrate current best evidence into the clinical and/or policy decision-making context to make your recommendations. How, exactly, will you integrate what you have found in your literature search with the client (micro or macro) at hand? What are some of the barriers to implementation?
Minimally Fulfilled

Recommendations are provided, but without discussion of implications or consequences.
Partially Fulfilled

Recommendations are stated and discussed.
Implications and consequences of the conclusion are reflected in context, relative to assumptions, and supporting evidence.
Mostly Fulfilled

Stated recommendations are based on a thorough examination of evidence, a clear explanation of reasonable alternatives, or an evaluation of possible consequences.
Reflection develops and challenges solutions by using some relevant information and some discussion of the consequences of the conclusions.
Fully Fulfilled

Stated recommendations are based on a thorough examination of evidence, a clear explanation of reasonable alternatives, and an evaluation of possible consequences.
Reflection develops and challenges solutions by using a variety of relevant information and analysis of the consequences of conclusions.
Written product quality
10 %

Written product quality (organization, quality of content, clarity, concise and well-edited, appropriate citations), APA style, within page limit.
Minimally Fulfilled

Writing generally follows the grammatical and spelling conventions of standard English
Partially Fulfilled

Writing follows the grammatical and spelling conventions of standard English diction is formal, avoiding “I” and “we,” slang, and contractions [for exception, see APA 2.04]
Mostly Fulfilled

Sentences are generally grammatically correct; ideas are readily understood but show signs of disorganization; some transitions between concepts are missing; there are occasional misspellings, especially
with homonyms not detected with spelling checks.
Fully Fulfilled

Student uses complex, grammatically correct sentences on a regular basis; expresses ideas clearly, concisely,
cogently, in logical fashion; uses words that
demonstrate a high level of vocabulary; has rare misspellings.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98