- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: How to Survive a Zombie Attack rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
How to Survive a Zombie Attack Investigating exponential growth and decay Rubric Code: WCA98A By slevine4 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Math Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

How to Survive a Zombie Attack
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Tables	Poor Tables are mostly empty or completely incorrect. There is no rule in the variable cell.	Fair Tables are partially filled or incorrectly filled. The variable cell is empty, or it is filled with a value rather than a rule.	Good Tables are completely filled, including the variable cell. Some cells may have minor errors. The variable cell is filled with a rule.	Excellent Tables are completely filled, correct, and rule is correctly placed in the variable cell.
Graphs	Poor Both graphs are missing or incomplete. Or, both graphs are completely incorrect.	Fair One graph is missing or completely incorrect. Or, both graphs have large errors in scale and plotting.	Good At least one graph has appropriate scales and is labelled correctly. Points are plotted correctly and curve is drawn correctly. One or both graphs may contain minor errors.	Excellent Both graphs have appropriate scales and are labelled correctly. Points are plotted correctly and curve is drawn correctly.
Understanding Equations	Poor Rules are missing or completely incorrect for all growth and decay models.	Fair Rules are missing or completely incorrect for two growth and decay models.	Good Correct rules are written for at least two growth and decay models with only minor errors.	Excellent Correct rules are written for all growth and decay models.
Critical Thinking	Poor Answers to questions indicate no understanding of concepts and/or answers and justifications are missing.	Fair Answers to questions indicate flawed understanding of concepts or are missing justifications.	Good Answers to questions indicate logical reasoning, but justifications may be lacking or missing. Justifications may indicate minor misunderstanding of concepts.	Excellent Answers to questions indicate logical reasoning, and justifications are provided for all answers.
Perseverance	Poor Student gave up on questions without asking for help from peers or teacher.	Fair Student attempted questions but gave up if they became difficult. Student may have asked for help, but did not persist in attempting the problems or ask for further assistance if still confused.	Good Student attempted most questions and asked for help from peers and teacher as needed. Student was able to work through challenging problems. Student did not edit answers in order to improve them.	Excellent Student attempted all questions and asked for help from peers and teachers as needed. Student persisted through challenging problems and edited mistakes.