iRubric: Fiscal Management Paper rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Fiscal Management Paper

PTA 211 assignment to explore the billing and reimbursement process at your clinical site. To avoid losing points it is recommended that you review your paper closely before submitting it. Some people find that having some one else read it is helpful. Pima faculty are NOT available to do this.

Rubric Code: WB93B7

By laurasage

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Fiscal Management
	Poor (N/A)	Fair (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Very Good (N/A)
On time 5 %	Poor received >24 hours late 0 points	Fair received 12-24 hours late 2 points	Good received <12 hours late 3 points	Very Good Received by instructor before deadline 5 points
Errors in spelling or grammar 5 %	Poor > 5 errors, excessive use of medical abbreviations 1 points	Fair 3-5 errors, moderate use of standard abbreviations 2 points	Good 1-2 errors, moderate use of standard abbreviations 3 points	Very Good Absolutely no errors in spelling or grammar, minimal or no use of medical abbreviations 5 points
Clear, brief, accurate explanation 35 %	Poor Minimal or vague details and no specific example 10 points	Fair Moderate detail, raises more questions than it answers 20 points	Good Shows understanding of the process, but may be missing an example, or has inaccuracy 25 points	Very Good Shows understanding of the process and include at least one example, with specific, accurate details (HIPAA compliant, of course) 35 points
Reflection 10 %	Poor No mention of current issues or personal reaction to billing & reimbursement process. 2 points	Fair Minimal or superficial discussion of personal reaction to and larger picture of the reimbursement of PT services 5 points	Good	Very Good Includes insight into the complexity or justice of the system. May explore larger health care delivery issues, including at least 1 reference. 10 points
Research 25 %	Poor No references 0 points	Fair One outside reference with in-text citations 15 points	Good 2 references, but missing in-text citations or one reference, with in-text citations or articles NOT directly related to reimbursement	Very Good Will have 2 (or more) outside references RELATED TO REIMBURSEMENT, proper in-text citations (for both direct quotes and paraphrasing) 25 points
Evidence of Interview 10 %	Poor No quotes or mention of interview with on site billing staff 0 points	Fair General or vague mention of interview, without quotes or specific reference to information 2 points 2 points	Good 1 reference or quote from billing staff 5 points	Very Good 2 or more references or quotes from billing staff 10 points
Does type of insurance matter? 10 % Specifically addresses how different insurances relate to patient care.	Poor Does not address how different insurances relate to billing or reimbursement at all 0 points	Fair Vague comments about how different insurances relate to PT decision-making 5 points	Good	Very Good Clearly addresses that different insurances do (or do not) effect PT decision-making 10 points

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric