iRubric: Peer Participation in Drama Performance rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Peer Participation in Drama Performance

Peer Participation/Performance in Wellness 424 Group Project

This rubric is designed to assess an individual's performance and contribution during a group project.

Rubric Code: WB6XB8

By dancrjil

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Graduate

Individual Assessment for:
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Very Good 4 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Contribution	Poor Rarely contributed thoughts or insights, if any.	Fair Occasionally contributed thoughts to the group project. Would seldom provide any ideas to advance the project.	Good Contributed thoughts and ideas to the group project. Contributions were of good quality.	Very Good Actively contributed thoughts and ideas to the group project. Contributions were of very good quality.	Excellent Constantly contributed thoughts and ideas to the group. Input was constructive and of a high calibre.
Cooperation	Poor Uncooperative and difficult to work with. Seemed to be counter productive. Negative attitude.	Fair Cooperative at times. Had some difficulty interacting with others. Attitude was fair.	Good Cooperative and productive most of the time. The amount varied depending on other competing tasks.	Very Good Cooperative and productive. Took a proactive approach to completing the assignment. Had a positive attitude.	Excellent Highly cooperative and worked extremely well with other group members. Was a positive influence to group work.
Performed Individual Task	Poor Failed to complete individual assignments, forcing others to finish what they did not do.	Fair Completed some individual assignments. Those completed fully were of fair quality.	Good Completed most of the individually assigned tasks. Or completed all tasks fully but some of the work was of fair quality.	Very Good Completed all individually assigned tasks. The work was passable enough to include in the project.	Excellent Completed all individual assignments and the individual tasks were of high quality.
Listened to Others / Communication	Poor Lacked acceptable communication skills. Did not listen to what others had to say. Did not work well in group.	Fair Communication was fair, but could have been better. Worked generally well with some but not all group members.	Good Attempted to communicate with everyone in the group. Worked well with most but there were a few instances of miscommunication.	Very Good Communication was very good. Worked well with others.	Excellent Excellent communication. Communication helped move the group in a forward direction. Worked very well with others.
Enthusiasm	Poor Lacked enthusiasm. No motivation.	Fair Enthusiasm and motivation were sporadic.	Good Moderately enthusiastic. Generally motivated.	Very Good Enthusiastic. Motivated.	Excellent Very Enthusiastic and motivated. Their enthusiasm helped the group stay focused.
Preparedness	Poor Often off task and failed to bring script/ materials. Would sometimes fail to participate in rehearsals at all.	Fair Came to rehearsals with incomplete tasks on a regular basis. Sometimes off task.	Good Came to rehearsals with some work done but not complete every day. Mostly on task.	Very Good Came to group meetings with most work done on a regular basis. Always on task.	Excellent Came to rehearsals fully prepared. Had notes and ideas for improvements to overall project. Always on task.

Subjects:

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric