iRubric: Case Studies Undergraduate Health Care Management rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Case Studies Undergraduate Health Care Management

Rubric Code: W87C82

By ShannaLou

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Reading

Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Under Grad Case Studies Criteria/ Points
	Exceptional 10 pts	Good 8 pts	Acceptable 6 pts	Poor 4 pts
Background Statement 10 % Main points made. Insight given. Critical thinking. Followed instructions.	Exceptional Many points clearly made. Lots of insight given. Great critical thinking; did not simply list information. Followed instructions.	Good Sufficient info given, many good points, but not in-depth Good amt of insight. Uses some critical thinking. Followed most instructions.	Acceptable Adequate inform given. A couple of good points addressed. Average amt of insight. May lack required elements. Uses little critical thinking.	Poor Inadequate amount of info. No additional points made. No insight given. Lacks required elements of content. Didn’t follow instructions.
Identified Role 10 % Focused. Organized. Transitions. Logic.	Exceptional Focused, well- organized. Clear, direct, excellent logical structure, great transitions.	Good Good portion was focused & organized, most flows easily. Clear, direct sentences. Strong logic.	Acceptable Adequately focused & organized. Limited flow-not very clear. Average logical structure.	Poor No focus/organization. Does not flow—no logical structure, not clear.
Format 20 % APA format. Length. Grammar. Spelling	Exceptional Proper APA format. No errors in citation formats. Required length (at least 150 words). No grammatical/spelling errors.	Good Mostly APA format; limited errors. 1-2 errors in citation. Required length (at least 150 words). Few grammatical/spelling errors	Acceptable APA format, but with several errors or omissions. >2 errors in citation. Required length (at least 150 words). Several grammatical/spelling errors	Poor APA format not used and errors throughout paper & citations. Under length required length. An abundance of grammatical/spelling errors
Identify Diversity Issues 10 % Identified factors/issues. Impact of factors/issues.	Exceptional Identified how matters of race, color, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, age, national origin, religion, and/or disability appear in this case and what impact might they have on this case	Good Identified diversity issues but did not discuss the impact they may have on the case.	Acceptable Limited flow-not very clear. Average logical structure >2 grammatical errors	Poor Inadequate amount of info. Lacks required elements of content. Didn’t follow instructions.
Major Problems identified 20 % Identify problems. Cause and effect. Reasoning.	Exceptional Specifically identify the major and secondary problems. Analyzed the causes and effect. Fully explained your reasoning.	Good Specifically identified major, did not identify secondary problems. Analyzed the causes, did not discuss the effect. Explained your reasoning to some degree.	Acceptable Did not identify the major and secondary problems. Did not analyze the causes and effect. Did not explained your reasoning.	Poor Did not identify problems. Did not analyze the causes and effect. Did not explain your reasoning.
Organizational Strengths 10 % Strengths. Weaknesses	Exceptional Identified strengths and weaknesses and explained how they are they positioned in the marketplace.	Good Identified strengths and weaknesses but was identical to previous section and did no enhance the case study.	Acceptable Did not identify strengths and/weakness to support the case study.	Poor Strengths and weakness were not identified.
Alternatives and Resolution 10 % Alternatives. Resolutions.	Exceptional Identified alternatives and what may be available. Specified the actions, steps and recommendations.	Good Identified alternatives. Did not think “outside the box” or use creative thought.	Acceptable Identified alternatives but did not discuss resolution to support the case study.	Poor Did not identify alternatives and resolutions.
Evaluation 10 % Final evaluation of the case study.	Exceptional Identified measurable goals and made recommendations based on that.	Good Identified how goals would be measured. Did not make recommendations.	Acceptable Did not identify measurable goals but offered resolution.	Poor Did not identify measureable goals nor offer recommendations.

Subjects:

Social Sciences

Types:

Reading

Discuss this rubric