Skip to main content

iRubric: Hunger Games Facebook Page rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Hunger Games Facebook Page 
Rubric Code: W782C4
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
  Poor

1 pts

Needs Improvement

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Layout

Poor

The FB page includes a minimum of the needed criteria and has no added creativity.
Needs Improvement

The FB page includes some of the criteria and has little to no creativity.
Good

The FB page includes most of the criteria but could use more creativity.
Excellent

The page stands out and includes all biographical information, quotes from the novel, photos, videos on the wall relating to the novel, friends with pictures, applicable wall posts, notes that function as diary entries, and any other creative ideas to be included in the FB page.
Graphics

Poor

Graphics seem randomly chosen, are of low quality, OR distract the reader.
Needs Improvement

Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the site, and are of good quality.
Good

Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the site, are of good quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.
Excellent

Graphics are related to the theme/purpose of the site, are thoughtfully cropped, are of high quality and enhance reader interest or understanding.
Links/Videos

Poor

Less than 3/4 of the links point to high quality, up to date, credible sites.
Needs Improvement

Most links point to high quality, up to date, credible sites.
Good

Almost all links point to high quality, up to date, credible sites.
Excellent

All links point to high quality, up to date credible sites.
Work Ethic

Poor

Students handed in project 3 or more days late.
Needs Improvement

Student handed in project 2 days late.
Good

Students handed in project a day late.
Excellent

Student handed in project on time.
Interest

Poor

The authors have provided only the minimum amount of information and has not transformed the information to make it more interesting to the audience (e.g. has only provided a list of links to the content of others)
Needs Improvement

The authors have put lots of information in the Web site but there is little evidence that the person tried to present the information in an interesting way.
Good

The authors have tried to make the content of this Web site interesting to the people for whom it is intended.
Excellent

The authors have made an exceptional attempt to make the content of this Web site interesting to the people for whom it's intended.
Content Accuracy

Poor

There are several inaccuracies in the content provided by the student OR many of the requirements were not met.
Needs Improvement

Almost all of the information provided by the student on the Web site is accurate and almost all of the requirements have been met.
Good

Almost all the information provided by the student on the Web site is accurate and all requirements of the assignment have been met.
Excellent

All information provided by the student on the Web site is accurate and all the requirements of the assignment have been met.




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n58