iRubric: Plagiarism Collaboration Project rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Plagiarism Collaboration Project

This is the way you will be graded on your collaboration project.

Rubric Code: W5CC8C

By SallyMechling

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Plagiarism Collaboration Project
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 3 pts	Excellent 5 pts
Presentation Focus/Format	Poor 0: presentation hard to follow and not able to understand what is being presented. 1: presentation is minimal in its focus with many shifts in format and text styles	Fair 2: Focus needs to be more clear but does have some structure. Sructure is not consistant from page to page. 3: Focus is clear but there are some breaks in format between some of the pages. The presentation is clear to follow for the most part but with some errors.	Excellent 4: Focus of presentation is clear and easy to follow. 5: All of 4 and visual cues allow for easy understanding of information. Example would be to include common Text Heading style for each of the 10 different formats.
Presentation Contents: 1	Poor 0: included 0-1 forms of plagiarism 1: included 2-3 forms of plagiarism	Fair 2: included 4-5 forms of plagiarism 3: included 6-7 forms of plagiarism	Excellent 4: included 8-9 forms of plagiarism 5: included 10 or more different forms of plagiarism.
Presentation Contents: 2	Poor 0: no reference to prevention was mentioned at all. 1: only a minor mention of reference to prevention was mentioned such as - don't do it.	Fair 3: Some discussion has been included but a thorough discussion of each is missing.	Excellent 5: Included prevention methods for each form of plagiarism discussed within the presentation. This may be as simple as stating not to do the practice but this must also include why and reference to proper ways to cite sources.
Presentation Contents:3	Poor 0: this was not addressed at all. 1: APA was only mentioned as a format for citation but nothing else was included.	Fair 3: some APA format is discussed but there are no detail or website available.	Excellent 5: APA format is discussed and includes general citation requirements. This does not need to be extremely detailed but it should it should be detailed enough to have an idea of the format and it should include references to at least one website where additional information in format can be found. Example would be some form of citation machine website.
Presentation Viewing	Poor 1: Viewing was very small and could only be read from the first two rows in class.	Fair 3: Viewing was clear but print was small enough not to see from a distance.	Excellent 5: easy to view from the back of the room. Details were easy to see and format was clear and easy to look at.
Presentation Mechanics	Poor 1: many errors in the grammer or spelling.	Fair 3: only a few gramatical or spelling errors.	Excellent 5: No gramatical errors or spelling errors. Writing clear and easy to read.

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric