iRubric: Underground Railroad Stations rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Underground Railroad Stations

Student teams conduct discreet research and mapping activities. Individuals are responsible for maintaining a log, collecting and recording evidence. The student must maintain a journal for recording information, notes and synthesizing information. Students are to reflect upon what they learned and upon the experience. Each individual is responsible for collaborating with others throughcooperative work. Their individual effort is essential for success of each team and the overall project.

Rubric Code: W4C94

By lightseeking1

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Project

Grade Levels: (none)

Student
	Excellent 20 pts	Good 15 pts	Satisfactory 10 pts	Poor 5 pts	Unacceptable 0 pts
Research portfolio 30 %	Excellent All information and research was submitted in a timely manner. Portfolio material was inclusive, carefully documented, well organized and complete.	Good All information and research was submitted in a timely manner. Portfolio material was inclusive, generally well organized and complete.	Satisfactory All information and research was submitted in a timely manner. Portfolio material was inclusive and complete.	Poor All information and research was submitted in a timely manner. Portfolio material was not inclusive, lacked documentation and incomplete.	Unacceptable All information was not submitted in a timely manner. Portfolio material was incomplete or missing.
Journal 30 % Notes, experience summary, re- flections indicating challenges and points of interest, what was learned, effects of slavery, historic preservat- ion.	Excellent Journal was well written and maintained. Included were all of the journal elements in great detail as listed.	Good Journal was generally well written and maintained. Included were all elements of journal listed.	Satisfactory Journal met most writing expectations. Limited elements of the following were included.	Poor Journal was poorly written and maintained. Some or much of the journal elements were limited or missing.	Unacceptable Journal was not submitted or was missing most of the journal elements
Log 15 %	Excellent Log was well maintained with dates, adequate detail of activities and complete notation of time spent	Good Log was well maintained with dates, detail of activities and notation of time spent	Satisfactory Log was maintained with dates, some detail of activities and notation of time spent	Poor Log was maintained with dates, limited or incomplete detail of activities and notation of time spent	Unacceptable Log was not submitted or was missing dates, detail of activities and notation time spent
Collaboration 30 %	Excellent Student successfully cooperated and collaborated with others giving full effort and attention to the teams' work, empowering team-mates and effectively communicating.	Good Student successfully cooperated and collaborated with others giving full effort and attention to the teams' work and effectively communicating.	Satisfactory Student successfully cooperated and collaborated with others giving effort to the teams' work, effectively communicating most of the time.	Poor Student generally cooperated and collaborated with team-mates but did not give full effort to the teams' work, and had difficulty communicating.	Unacceptable Student was unsuccessful in cooperatingwith others. Student was unable to give effort and/or attention to the teams' work; communication was inappropriate or disruptive.
Contribution 10 %	Excellent Student was valuable in providing contributions to the success of their team and the overall project. Effort, accuracy, rigor and enthusiasm positively supported the team and project.	Good Student was valuable in providing contributions to the success of their team and the overall project. Effort and accuracy positively supported the team and project.	Satisfactory Student was valuable in providing contributions to the success of their team and the overall project. Effort supported the team and project.	Poor Student inconsistently provided contributions in support of their team and the overall project.	Unacceptable Student was unable to provide a positive contribution to their team and undermined the success of the team and the project.

Keywords:

Underground Railroad Routes and Stations

Subjects:

History

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric