iRubric: Taking Off: Emerging Technologies rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Taking Off: Emerging Technologies

More to Explore

A rubric for grading the collaborative wiki pages. Collaboratin will be graded separately under professionalism.

Rubric Code: W3746X

By AuntyTech

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Graduate

Emerging Technologies
	Poor 0 pts	Fair 3 pts	Good 5 pts
Reserve Topic 1 pts	Poor Directions were not followed	Fair Directions were followed somewhat but instructor intervention was required. i.e. topic had alredy been chosen, title of page was not clearly related to topic, etc.	Good Directions were followed to create a page, add first name and reserve a page and topic.
Overview and Overall Information 2 pts	Poor Overview was not provided or was not clear. The discussion, ideas, examples and resources on this page would not be useful to other school library media specialists.	Fair Overview was not clear or did not reflect student's own understanding of the topic The discussion, ideas, examples and resources on this page would have limited usefulness to other school library media specialists.	Good Overview of the topic was provided. Overview was clear and concise and reflects and understanding of the topic. The discussion, ideas, examples and resources on this page would be useful to other school library media specialists.
Examples 2 pts	Poor No examples were given	Fair Examples were not appropriate and/or did not help to expand an understanding of the topic.	Good Examples or links to examples were included and appropriate to the topic
Resources 2 pts	Poor No additional resources were provided or were not appropriate to the topic.	Fair Some resources were provided but one or more links were not made or did not work.	Good Good resources on the topic were cited and included. Links were accurate.
Potential/Ideas 2 pts	Poor The ideas were explored.	Fair Ideas for using this technology were not clearly identified. Pros and cons not identified.	Good Ideas for using this technology in classrooms and in the school library media program was clearly and thoughtfully delineated. Included pros and cons.
Appearance 1 pts	Poor Page was not professional in appearance. There is more than one error in grammar, spelling or punctuation.	Fair Page was somewhat profesional in appearance but lacked cohesive look, graphics or other elements. There is one error in grammar, spelling or punctuation.	Good Page was professional in appearance and included at least one graphics. Exemplary work includes videos, slideshows or other elements beyond basic text. There are no errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation.