- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Movie Review rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Movie Review Movie Review Review a movie, with reference to two other published movie reviews of the same movie. Rubric Code: W238853 By RMacCarthy Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Writing Grade Levels: (none)

Movie Review
	Excellent (N/A)	Good (N/A)	Needs Improvement (N/A)
Audience engagement	Excellent The introduction works perfectly to hook reader attention and your topic and judgment are on the movie are clear. The introduction and conclusion speak to the reader.	Good The introduction and conclusion act like bookends and/or provide some interesting points. General information about the topic is given.	Needs Improvement The introduction and conclusion do not engage the reader or give enough information. Your judgement of the movie remains unclear.
Descriptive/creative language	Excellent The description of the plot, characters and setting gives readers all the information we need. As well as supporting your review. The detailed description is engaging, and creative language is used effectively to connect with audiences.	Good The description of plot, characters and setting is appropriate but lacks sensory detail or interesting vocabulary. Some examples of creative language are used to interest readers, though it may be stereotypical or basic.	Needs Improvement Either there is almost no description, or it is poorly developed. The descriptive and creative language is uninteresting or difficult to follow along with.
Analysis	Excellent The writer fully explains and analyses the chosen scenes and links them to their overall judgement on the film. Explanation that wonderfully evokes the material. Several SWAT or film codes and conventions are referred to.	Good The writer explains and analyses the chosen scenes well, covering all bases but lacking some detail. The link to their overall judgement on the film is mentioned. Some SWAT or film codes and conventions are referred to.	Needs Improvement There are many errors in the content or style of the analysis. Either the judgement is not explained, or the connection between the analysis and the judgment are clumsy or not there at all. Too few or no SWAT or film codes and conventions are referred to.
Cohesion	Excellent There were no or extremely minimal mistakes in grammar, spelling and punctuation.	Good There were few mistakes in grammar, spelling, and punctuation	Needs Improvement There were numerous mistakes in grammar, spelling, and punctuation which makes the text difficult to understand.