iRubric: Lord of the Flies Island Project rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Lord of the Flies Island Project

Draw a map of the island including the colors and features Golding describes in chapters 1 and 2. Respond to the prompt and include text evidence to support your answer.

Rubric Code: VXCBC55

By tisaac01

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Education

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 6-8

______________ Island Project
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Colors	Excellent Group has used colors and features Golding describes in chapters 1 and 2.	Good Group has included some of the colors and included 1 feature from the text.	Fair Group has used some color in their drawing.	Poor Drawing does not include any colors nor features depicted in chapters 1 and 2.
Island Shape	Excellent The drawing resembles the outline Golding describes in chapter 1.	Good The drawing somewhat resembles the outline from chapter 1.	Fair The drawing resembles an island.	Poor The drawing does not resemble an island.
Text evidence	Excellent The writing shows an understanding of the prompt. The response correctly restates the prompt and uses text evidence to support the answer.	Good The writing shows an understanding of the prompt and correctly uses text evidence to support the answer.	Fair The writing shows a little understanding of the prompt and uses text evidence.	Poor The writing does not reflect an understanding, does not include text evidence, nor does it restate the prompt.
Geographic Features	Excellent The map includes all of the island's geographic features and is visually appealing.	Good The map includes most of the island's features and indicates some effort to produce quality.	Fair The map includes most of the island's features, but it reflects little quality or effort.	Poor The map is missing some of the island's major geographic features.
On- Task	Excellent The group was on task at all times and worked together to complete the project in a timely manner. Group attitudes were positive.	Good The group was on-task 90% of the time they were working together. Most group members worked together towards a common goal, but one group member failed to fully participate.	Fair The group was on-task between 80-90% of the time. Half of the group members worked to complete the task, while others were off-task, argumentative, or disengaged.	Poor The group were only on-task less than 80% the time of the project. The group often were argumentative and spent little time working towards the common goal of completion of the project.