Skip to main content

iRubric: Vocal Performance Duets rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Vocal Performance Duets 
Rubric Code: VX8ACA5
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Music  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Vocal Performance duets
  Excellent

10 pts

Good

8 pts

Fair

6 pts

Poor

4 pts

Unacceptable

2 pts

Rhythmic Accuracy

Excellent

Rhythms are consistently accurate as notated, enhancing the overall prformance. Professional level rhythmic accuracy.
Good

Incorrect rhythms rarely occur without detracting from the overall performance.
Fair

Incorrect rhythms occasionally occur detracting from the overall performance.
Poor

Incorrect rhythms frequently occur detracting from the overall performance.
Unacceptable

Incorrect rhythms consistently occur significantly detracting from the overall performance. Rhythms generally unrecognizable.
Pitch Accuracy

Excellent

Pitches are consistently accurate as notated, enhancing the overall performance. Professional level pitch accuracy.
Good

Incorrect pitches rarely occur without detracting from the overall performance.
Fair

Incorrect pitches occasionally occur detracting from the overall performance.
Poor

Incorrect pitches frequently occur detracting from the overall performance.
Unacceptable

Incorrect pitches consistently occur significantly detracting from the overall performance. Pitches generally unrecognizable.
Intonation

Excellent

Intonation is consistently accurate during performance. Professional level intonation.
Good

Intonation is usually accurate without detracting for the overall performance.
Fair

Intonation is usually accurate, but detracting from the overall performance.
Poor

Intonation is rarely accurate, detracting from the overall performance.
Unacceptable

Intonation is never accurate, significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Phrasing

Excellent

Phrasing is consistently accurate as notated, enhancing the overall performance. Professional level phrasing.
Good

Incorrect phrasing rarely occurs without detracting from the overall performance.
Fair

Incorrect phrasing ocassionaly occur detracting from the performance.
Poor

Incorrect phrasing frequently occur which is detracting from the performance.
Unacceptable

Incorrect phrasing significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Diction

Excellent

Vowels are stable and consistent; consonants are clear, crisp and appropriate to the language being sung enhancing the overall performance. Professional level diction.
Good

Vowels are rarely inaccurate, consonants are rarely unclear without detracting from the overall performance.
Fair

Vowels are occasionally inaccurate, consonants are occasionally unclear, detracting from the performance.
Poor

Vowels are frequently inaccurate, consonants are frequently unclear, detracting from the performance.
Unacceptable

Vowels are consistently inaccurate, consonants are consistently unclear, significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Tone Quality

Excellent

Tone is consistently focused, clear, centered and ringing tone throught the dynamic range enhancing the overall performance. Professional tone quality.
Good

Tone is usually focused, clear, centered and ringing tone throughout the dynamic range without detracting from the overall performance.
Fair

Tone is mostly focused, clear, centered throughout the dynamic range, detracting from the overall performance.
Poor

Tone is rarely focused, clear, centered throughout the dynamic range, detracting from the overall performance.
Unacceptable

Tone is never focused, clear, centered throughout the dynamic range, significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Dynamics

Excellent

Dynamics are consistently accurate enhancing the overall performance. Professional level dynamics.
Good

Dynamcis are usually accurate without detracting from the overall performance.
Fair

Dynamics are sometimes accurate detracting from the overall performance.
Poor

Dynamics are rarely accurate within the ensemble, detracting from the overall performance.
Unacceptable

Dynamics are never accurate significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Breathing Technique

Excellent

Breath mechanics are consistently employed enhancing the overall performance. Professional level technique.
Good

Breath mechanics are usually employed, without detracting from the overall performance.
Fair

Breath mechanics are often employed, but detract from the overall performance.
Poor

Breath mechanics are rarely employed, detracting from the overall performance.
Unacceptable

Breath mechanics are never employed, significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Performance

Excellent

Performers sing from memory, communicating the emotional sense of the piece at all times. Professional level performance.
Good

Performers sing from memory, usually communicating the emotional sense of the piece without detracting from the overall performance.
Fair

Performers sing from memory, occasionally communicating the emotinal sense of the piece, detracting from the overall performance.
Poor

Performers occasionally sing from memory and occasionally communicate the emotion of the piece detracting from the overall performance.
Unacceptable

Performers do not sing from memory and do not communicate the emotion of the piece significantly detracting from the overall performance.
Posture/Allignment

Excellent

Student exhibits a balanced, free and flexible posture throughout the performance.
Good

Student exhibits a balanced, free and flexible posture throughout most of the performance.
Fair

Student exhibits a balanced, free, and flexible posture throught some of the performance. At times posture becomes rigid.
Poor

Student exhibits an unbalanced, rigid, and inflexible posture throught some of the performance.
Unacceptable

Student exhibits an unbalanced, rigid, and inflexible posture throught all of the performance.
Ensemble

Excellent

Performers worked exceptionally well together. Harmony produced was extremely good. The connection between the performers was highly evident.
Good

Performers worked well together. Harmony produced was accurate. Able to alternate between performers successfully. The connection between the performers was evident.
Fair

Performers were able to work together some of the time. Harmony produced was mostly accurate. Able to alternate between performers somewhat successfully. Some connection between performers.
Poor

Performers were able to work together a bit. Harmony produced was mostly inaccurate. Rarely able to alternate between performers.
Rarely a connection between performers.
Unacceptable

Performers were not able to work together at all. Harmony produced was incorrect. Unable to alternate between performers. No connection between performers.




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202