Skip to main content

iRubric: COUN 5320 Facing Shadows Brief Reaction Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
COUN 5320 Facing Shadows Brief Reaction Paper 
Due Tuesday, 11/12@11:55pm: Syllabus Instruction: "Write a brief reaction paper (750-1000 words) focusing on your reaction to the material and usefulness in ministry/counseling (see Sakai for further instructions and grading rubric)."
Rubric Code: VBXX32
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Psychology  
Type: Reading  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Brief Reaction Paper Rubric
Total value 40 points
  Poor

5 pts

Fair

20 pts

Good

30 pts

Excellent

40 pts

Reading Completion
20 %

Responsiveness to Assigned Reading(s)

Poor

1pt. Response reflects no evidence of assigned readings - off-topic.
Fair

4pts. Although response is on topic, it does not explicitly reflect the assigned readings -- it could have been written without completing the readings.
Good

6pts. Somewhat unclear that readings were understood or not all readings explicitly included.
Excellent

8pts. Very clear that all assigned readings were understood by incorporation into reaction.
Personalization
35 %

Exploration of Personal Reactions

Poor

1.75pts. Shows minimal awareness of personal reactions, focusing solely on intellectualized reactions.
Fair

7pts. Identifies personal reactions, but demonstrates little exploration or understanding of these reactions; avoids discomfort and uncertainty.
Good

10.5pts. Discusses personal reactions, including exploration of the basis for these reactions (e.g., recognizes new perspectives about own cultural rules and biases).
Excellent

14pts. Deeply explores personal reactions, including exploration of the basis for these reactions (e.g., articulates insights into own cultural rules and biases); willingness to sit with uncertainty and not seek easy answers.
Application
15 %

Application of Readings to Personal and Professional Self

Poor

.75pts. No mention of implications of the readings for student's personal or professional attitudes and/or behaviors.
Fair

3pts. Implications of the readings for personal / professional attitudes / behaviors minimal or perfunctory.
Good

4.5pts. Student addresses implications of the readings for personal / professional attitudes and/or behaviors.
Excellent

6pts. Student identifies and discusses implications of the readings for personal / professional attitudes and/or behaviors in a complex way.
Additional questions
10 %

Questions Raised by the Readings

Poor

.5pts. Response does not include any questions raised for the student by the readings.
Fair

2pts. Response includes 1 or more questions, but these are either questions already raised in the readings or questions not directly inspired by the readings. Question(s) are clearly identified
Good

3pts. Response includes 1 or more questions raised by the reading. but the question is yes/no or focused on simple facts -- unlikely to foster discussion. Question(s) are clearly identified
Excellent

4pts. Response includes 2 or more questions raised by the reading(s) that are integrative without a conclusive answer and thus are likely to foster further thought & discussion. Question(s) are clearly identified
Technical Writing
12 %

Grammar, Spelling, Overall Professional Appearance

Poor

.6pts. Response contains so many typographical and grammatical errors as to be difficult to read.
Fair

2.4pts. Response contains a distracting level of typographical and/or grammatical errors. APA guidelines frequently missed.
Good

3.6pts. Response contains minimal typographical and/or grammatical errors. APA guidelines closely followed.
Excellent

4.8pts. Response contains nearly zero typographical and/or grammatical errors. APA guidelines strictly adhered to in all areas including any sources referenced in the paper.
Use of Words
8 %

Quantity & Efficiency

Poor

.4pts. Less than 750 or more than 1000 words. Tended to be sparse or wordy
Fair

1.6pts. Less than 750 or more than 1000 words, but made good use of allocation.
Good

2.4pts. Between 750 and 1000 words but ended to be sparse or wordy
Excellent

3.2pts. Between 750 and 1000 words. Made good use of allocation.



Keywords:
  • Brief Reaction paper







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n224