- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: AR 107 Architecture Project II Assessment rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
AR 107 Architecture Project II Assessment Art Project Assessment A guideline that properly evaluates the design process. It measures the various phases and approaches that are necessary in the assessment of a project. Rubric Code: V987BB By LzWong Draft Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Assessment Grade Levels: 9-12

AR 107 Architecture Project II
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Average 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Assignment 1 10 % Precedence Study
Understanding of Context 5 % Level of understanding of technical, historical or theoretical issues in residential buildings responding to tropical sites' context and design approach.	Excellent The report is planned carefully; understanding of all historical or theoretical issues in residential buildings responding to tropical sites' context and design approach is clearly demonstrated.	Good The report is planned carefully; understanding of most historical or theoretical issues in residential buildings responding to tropical sites' context and design approach is mostly demonstrated.	Average The report is planned adequately; understanding of some historical or theoretical issues in residential buildings responding to tropical sites' context and some design approach demonstrated.	Fair The report shows little evidence of understanding the historical or theoretical issues in residential buildings responding to tropical sites' context and design approach.	Poor The report shows no understanding of the historical or theoretical issues in residential buildings responding to tropical sites' context and design approach.
Site Analysis 5 % Technical skills to prepare a comprehensive report.	Excellent The report shows outstanding technical skills,with clear attention to understand, analyze & evaluate the site context.	Good The report shows good technical skills, with most attention to understand, analyze & evaluate the site context.	Average The report shows average technical skills with average attention to understand, analyze & evaluate the site context.	Fair The report shows minimal technical skills with little attention to understand, analyze & evaluate the site context.	Poor The report shows no technical skills with no attention to understand, analyze & evaluate the site context.
Assignment 2 30 % Conceptual Development
Parti 10 % Inventiveness, expression of ideas.	Excellent The ideas demonstrate original personal expression.	Good The ideas demonstrate some personal expression.	Average The ideas demonstrate an average amount of personal expression.	Fair The ideas demonstrate little personal expression.	Poor The ideas lacks evidence of personal expression.
Ideas Development 5 % Advancement of ideas developed through design tactics.	Excellent Student demonstrates an outstanding design tactics with full understanding of idea, and develop successfully.	Good Student demonstrates a good design tactics with most understanding of idea, and develop well.	Average Student demonstrates an average design tactics with some understanding of idea, and develop partially.	Fair Student demonstrates a poor design tactics with little understanding of idea, and develop least.	Poor Student does not demonstrates any design tactics with no understanding of idea, and development.
Function & Circulation 5 % Level of transformation of concept into function & circulation of the design	Excellent The transformation process of concept to function & circulation is clearly demonstrated.	Good The transformation process of concept to function & circulation is demonstrated.	Average Some transformation process of concept to function & circulation is demonstrated.	Fair Little transformation process of concept to function & circulation is demonstrated.	Poor No transformation process of concept to function & circulation is demonstrated.
Form & Space 5 % Integration of form, space, function & circulation	Excellent The student shows an outstanding design with a clear integration of form, space, function & circulation.	Good The student shows a good design with integration of form, space, function & circulation.	Average The student shows an average design with some integration of form, space, function & circulation.	Fair The student shows a poor design with little integration of form, space, function & circulation.	Poor The student shows very poor design without any integration of form, space, function & circulation.
Diagram & Sketches 5 % Ability of student to presents the idea & design with paper.	Excellent Student was able to presents the idea & design with paper clearly.	Good Student was good to presents the idea & design with paper.	Average Student was able to presents the idea & design with paper averagely.	Fair Student was poor to presents the idea & design with paper.	Poor Student was unable to presents the idea & design with paper averagely.
Assignment 3 20 % Sketch Design Proposal
Site Plan 5 % Technical drawings skill used to examine the students' application level in architecture	Excellent Student shows an outstanding technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.	Good Student shows a good technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.	Average Student shows mostly technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.	Fair Student shows little technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.	Poor Student does not shows technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Plans 5 % Technical drawings skill used to examine the students' application level in architecture	Excellent Student shows an outstanding technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.	Good Student shows a good technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.	Average Student shows mostly technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.	Fair Student shows little technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.	Poor Student does not shows technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Elevations 5 % Technical drawings skill used to examine the students' application level in architecture	Excellent Student shows an outstanding technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.	Good Student shows a good technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.	Average Student shows mostly technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.	Fair Student shows little technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.	Poor Student does not shows technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Sections 5 % Technical drawings skill used to examine the students' application level in architecture	Excellent Student shows an outstanding technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.	Good Student shows a good technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.	Average Student shows mostly technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.	Fair Student shows little technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.	Poor Student does not shows technical drawings skill in producing sketch design proposal.
Assignment 4 40 % Final Design Proposal
Oral Presentation 5 % The skills to test student's oral communication	Excellent Student demonstrates an outstanding oral communication to present his/her design.	Good Student demonstrates a good oral communication present his/her design.	Average Student demonstrates an average oral communication present his/her design.	Fair Student demonstrates a poor oral communication present his/her design.	Poor Student could not present his/her design.
Presentation Boards 5 % i. Parti - Main concept presents	Excellent The parti is successfully developed with understanding of all theoretical study; critically respond to sites' context and design approach is clearly demonstrated.	Good The parti is well developed with understanding of most theoretical study; critically respond to sites' context and design approach is demonstrated.	Average The parti is averagely developed with understanding of some theoretical study; critically respond to sites' context and design approach is partially demonstrated.	Fair The parti is poor developed with understanding of little theoretical study; critically respond to sites' context and design approach is demonstrated least.	Poor The parti does not shows any development with no understanding of theoretical study; no critically respond to sites' context and design approach are demonstrated.
5 % ii. Drawings	Excellent Student shows an outstanding technical graphics skills in presenting the idea & design.	Good Student shows a good technical graphics skills in presenting the idea & design.	Average Student shows an average technical graphics skills in presenting the idea & design.	Fair Student shows a poor technical graphics skills in presenting the idea & design.	Poor Student could not shows technical graphics skills in presenting the idea & design.
5 % iii. Material & Detailing	Excellent Understanding & application of all basic material and detailing is clearly demonstrated.	Good Understanding & application of all basic material and detailing is demonstrated.	Average Understanding & application of all basic material and detailing is mostly demonstrated.	Fair Little understanding & application of all basic material and detailing is demonstrated.	Poor No understanding & application of all basic material and detailing is demonstrated.
5 % iv. Format & Technique	Excellent An outstanding of graphic format & technique is shown in final presentation.	Good A good graphic format & technique is shown in final presentation.	Average An average of graphic format & technique is shown in final presentation.	Fair A poor graphic format & technique is shown in final presentation.	Poor No graphic format & technique is shown in final presentation.
Model 10 % i. Model Making Skill - tidiness - cleanliness	Excellent Model produced shows an outstanding product at final presentation.	Good Model produced shows a good product at final presentation.	Average Model produced shows an average product at final presentation.	Fair Model produced shows a poor product at final presentation.	Poor Model produced shows a very poor product at final presentation.
Overall Presentation 5 % Oral, boards, attire, personal characters	Excellent Overall presentation is outstanding.	Good Overall presentation is good.	Average Overall presentation is average.	Fair Overall presentation is poor.	Poor Overall presentation is very poor.

Keywords:

Parti, Design, Proposed, Work

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric