iRubric: Team Lesson Presentation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Team Lesson Presentation

Please create an art history lesson with abundant visual aids and an assessment activity to check your teaching and your audience's attention. You will research, explore and report on a topic of your choosing from the history of art and take 10 minutes to present your findings to the class using notes. You will submit a rough draft of your report and activity at least two classes prior to your presentation, and submit a final draft in class prior to your presentation.

Rubric Code: V88C42

By mrhouston

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Art History Term Paper
	Superior to Exceeds 25-23 (N/A)	Meets at Mid-level 22-20 (N/A)	Meets at a Low Level 20-18 (N/A)	Does Not Meet 18 - 0 1 pts
Research/Documentation	Superior to Exceeds 25-23 Uses 2 or more book sources and 4 or more qualified Internet sources. Bibliography is complete - research is accurately cited throughout the paper.	Meets at Mid-level 22-20 2 book sources and 4 qualified internet sources. Bibliography is complete and accurate. Adequate citations.	Meets at a Low Level 20-18 2 minimal book sources 4 internet sources - not all of which are fully qualified. Bibliography minor errors. Few citations.	Does Not Meet 18 - 0 Uses less than 2 book sources and less than 4 qualified Internet sources. Research is minimal. Bibliography is missing, incomplete or incorrect. Few or no citations.
Proceedure	Superior to Exceeds 25-23 Clear and concise thesis statement. Copious original notes are taken from research. Organized and complete outline. Rough-draft turned in on time. Necessary changes were edited. Final paper turned in by the due date. Thoughtful assessment activity was included.	Meets at Mid-level 22-20 Clear thesis statement. Adequate original notes are taken. Outline is simple and clear. Rough draft is adequate and handed in on time. Final draft reflects editing suggestions and is handed in by the due date. Assessment activity was appropriate.	Meets at a Low Level 20-18 Clear thesis statement. Some original notes are taken. Out line is used - but not clear. Rough draft is handed in but is late or incomplete. Final draft is edited, but not completely fixed. Assessment activity was not thorough and didn't sufficiently review material.	Does Not Meet 18 - 0 Thesis statement is unclear. Few or no notes are taken during research. No outline or a partial or unclear outline. Rough draft not turned in by the due date. Assessment activity not included.
Content and Presentation	Superior to Exceeds 25-23 Well-researched paper that expresses a deep understanding of the art, context and culture of the era. Major art innovations and ground-breaking artists of the era and their contributions are examined. Visuals include a variety of relevant artwork, maps, or other visuals and richly illustrate the lesson. Bibliography is complete. Presentation was full 10 minutes.	Meets at Mid-level 22-20 Writes a well-researched paper on the chosen topic that expresses moderately deep understanding of the art, context(s), and culture(s) of the topic. Report is complete but complimented by only a few graphics and a few details about artistic innovations, artistic leaders, current events and culture. Presentation was 10 minutes.	Meets at a Low Level 20-18 Writes a moderately researched paper on the topic that expresses some understanding of the art, context(s) and culture(s) (though all aspects are present) of the topic. Details about innovations, artistic leaders, current events and culture may be incomplete. Visual aides are a carbon-copy of the paper. Presentation was short of 10 minutes.	Does Not Meet 18 - 0 Writes a poorly researched paper that expresses only minimal understanding of the topic - may be missing significant information on context, content or formal analysis or the art. Visual aides is incomplete or not done at all. Presentation was significantly less than 10 minutes.
Organization and Writing skills	Superior to Exceeds 25-23 Research paper is very well organized - with the topic explored methodically in terms of context, meaning and formal analysis of the art -for clear illustration/ defense of the thesis. Final paper is written with few or no grammatical, spelling or structural errors.	Meets at Mid-level 22-20 Final research paper is well organized and well written with minimal grammatical, spelling or structural errors. Thesis is well illustrated/defended.	Meets at a Low Level 20-18 Research paper is somewhat organized but still coherent. Thesis is fairly well illustrated/defended. Final aper has a number of grammatical, spelling and/or structural errors that detract from the message of the lesson.	Does Not Meet 18 - 0 Resarch paper is poorly organized and hard to follow. Paper has many grammatical, spelling and/or structural errors that make the lesson confusing.

Subjects:

History

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric