Skip to main content

iRubric: Astronomy Capstone Tag-It-And-Bag-It rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Astronomy Capstone Tag-It-And-Bag-It 
This rubric assesses the capstone project for seniors taking Astronomy. Students decorate four sides of a bag according to insgtractions and then place five items in the being relating to content.
Rubric Code: V773W5
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Capstone Tag-It-and-Bag-It
  Not assessable/unacceptable

0 pts

Underachieved

1 pts

Developing

2 pts

Achieving

3 pts

Exceptional

4 pts

Promtness

Not assessable/unacceptable

The project is presented more than 2 days late.
Underachieved

The project is presented 2 days late.
Developing

The project is presented one day late.
Achieving

The student presents the project on the due date.
Exceptional

The student's project is completely finished and ready to present at the beginning of class. Student attitude demonstrates readiness to share.
Artful Expression and Effort

Not assessable/unacceptable

The student's project has no art or art that is unrelated to course content. No meaningful effort was used.
Underachieved

The project has relevant art but
- it is so poorly executed that it distracts from the project as a whole AND/OR
- minimal effort and thought was required.
Developing

The student's project is adequately decorated. Some effort and thought was employed to express the content artfully, but could be more engaging.
Achieving

The student's project is attractive. The art expresses the content in a meaningful way and adds to the viewers understanding.
Exceptional

The students project represents an extraordinary effort to represent the content in a meaningful way. The art is well crafted, exhibiting pride in craftsmanship. It is exceptionally engaging.
Wide Panel 1: Overall Theme

Not assessable/unacceptable

Panel is not completed or does not illustrate or express the required content.
Underachieved

The panel does illustrate some of the required content, but little engaged thinking was required.
Developing

The panel illustrates the required content. The student can explain how the art and prose relate to overall themes of the course.
Achieving

The overall themes of the course are immediately obvious in the panel's design. Art and prose are clear and student can confidently explain how they relate to the course.
Exceptional

The student went to extraordinary effort to capture most of the courses major themes in art and prose. Both the panel and the student's explanation of it are highly engaging.
Wide Panel 2: Your Growth

Not assessable/unacceptable

Panel is not completed or does not illustrate or express the required content.
Underachieved

The panel does illustrate some of the required content, but little engaged thinking was required.
Developing

The panel illustrates the required content. The student can explain their feelings or describe their experience engaging with the content of the course.
Achieving

The panel illustrates the required content. The student can how they have matured in their understanding of the Cosmos as a result of the courses.
Exceptional

The panel clearly expresses the student's growth in understanding the Cosmos sand their place in it. The explanation shows meaningful reflection.
Narrow Panel 1:Experiment/Theory

Not assessable/unacceptable

Panel is not completed or does not illustrate or express the required content.
Underachieved

The panel does illustrate some of the required content, but little engaged thinking was required.
Developing

The panel illustrates the required content. The student accurately describes an experiment or theoretical construct that advanced Astronomy.
Achieving

The student accurately describes an experiment or theoretical construct that advanced Astronomy. The student clearly explains procedures and results, or illuminates the direct result of useful theories.
Exceptional

The panel clearly attempts to fully describe how theory and experiment were combined to advance our understanding of the Cosmos. Scientific vocabulary is accurately used.
Narrow Panel 2:Favorite Concept

Not assessable/unacceptable

Panel is not completed or does not illustrate or express the required content.
Underachieved

The panel does illustrate some of the required content, but little engaged thinking was required.
Developing

The panel illustrates the required content. The student can explain the concept or idea accurately.
Achieving

The panel illustrates the required content. The concept or idea is accurately illustrated. The student gives a full explanation of the concept or idea.
Exceptional

The student uses the panel to fully realize an important concept or idea in aquatic science. The student uses concrete examples from the course material and scientific vocabulary in explaining the content.
Object 1:

Not assessable/unacceptable

Object is absent or student cannot give a meaningful explanation of how it relates to course content.
Underachieved

The object relates to the one unit of the content, but only in a vague or tangential manner.
Developing

The object relates to one unit of the content in a meaningful way. The student gives an explanation that is adequate.
Achieving

The object relates to one unit of the content in a meaningful way. The student gives a complete explanation of how the object represents key content.
Exceptional

The object relates to one unit of the content in a meaningful way. The student explains how the object represents content in way that demonstrates imaginative or deeply reflective thinking.
Object 2

Not assessable/unacceptable

Object is absent or student cannot give a meaningful explanation of how it relates to course content.
Underachieved

The object relates to the one unit of the content, but only in a vague or tangential manner.
Developing

The object relates to one unit of the content in a meaningful way. The student gives an explanation that is adequate.
Achieving

The object relates to one unit of the content in a meaningful way. The student gives a complete explanation of how the object represents key content.
Exceptional

The object relates to one unit of the content in a meaningful way. The student explains how the object represents content in way that demonstrates imaginative or deeply reflective thinking.
Object 3

Not assessable/unacceptable

Object is absent or student cannot give a meaningful explanation of how it relates to course content.
Underachieved

The object relates to the one unit of the content, but only in a vague or tangential manner.
Developing

The object relates to one unit of the content in a meaningful way. The student gives an explanation that is adequate.
Achieving

The object relates to one unit of the content in a meaningful way. The student gives a complete explanation of how the object represents key content.
Exceptional

The object relates to one unit of the content in a meaningful way. The student explains how the object represents content in way that demonstrates imaginative or deeply reflective thinking.
Object 4

Not assessable/unacceptable

Object is absent or student cannot give a meaningful explanation of how it relates to course content.
Underachieved

The object relates to the one unit of the content, but only in a vague or tangential manner.
Developing

The object relates to one unit of the content in a meaningful way. The student gives an explanation that is adequate.
Achieving

The object relates to one unit of the content in a meaningful way. The student gives a complete explanation of how the object represents key content.
Exceptional

The object relates to one unit of the content in a meaningful way. The student explains how the object represents content in way that demonstrates imaginative or deeply reflective thinking.
Object 5

Not assessable/unacceptable

Object is absent or student cannot give a meaningful explanation of how it relates to course content.
Underachieved

The object relates to the one unit of the content, but only in a vague or tangential manner.
Developing

The object relates to one unit of the content in a meaningful way. The student gives an explanation that is adequate.
Achieving

The object relates to one unit of the content in a meaningful way. The student gives a complete explanation of how the object represents key content.
Exceptional

The object relates to one unit of the content in a meaningful way. The student explains how the object represents content in way that demonstrates imaginative or deeply reflective thinking.



Keywords:
  • Capstone Tag It Bag It Astronomy

Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243