iRubric: EVALUATION OF A TOPICAL/ORGANIZATIONAL WEBSITE rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

EVALUATION OF A TOPICAL/ORGANIZATIONAL WEBSITE

Evaluation of Educational Website for Teachers

The purpose of this rubric is to evaluate an online topical/organizational website for student created sites.

Rubric Code: V5C683

By lriddle

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Vocational

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Organizational Website Evaluation STUDENT NUMBER # __________________
	Poor 25 pts	Fair 50 pts	Good 75 pts	Excellent 100 pts
Requirements (20 points) If there are not a minimum of 10 references - will receive an automatic zero.	Poor Topic is not defined. No labeled "Organizational-Homepage" in W drive. No underlying pages. Files and data not organized in W: drive.	Fair Topic is somewhat-defined. Labeled "Organizational-Homepage" in W drive, but some what difficult to find. 1 or 2 underlying pages. Files and data are somewhat organized in W: drive.	Good Topic defined. Labeled "Organizational-Homepage" in W: drive. 3 underlying pages. Files and data organized, but could use 1 or 2 changes for optimal organization in W: drive.	Excellent Topic purpose well-defined. (includes clear title and definitions). More than 4 underlying pages. Labeled "Organizational-Homepage" in W: drive. Files and data are well organized in W: drive.
Navagation system (10 points)	Poor Website has a poor or no navigation system. None of the links work properly. No sub menus included.	Fair Website has a simple (words linked) navigation system with no sub-menus. Some of the links work properly.	Good Website has a basic navigation system with one or two sub-menus. Website has tabs or sub menus for various members of the target audience. All of the links work properly.	Excellent Website has an advanced navigation system with sub menus. Website is easy to navigate with the use of the tabs. All links work properly and links are well organized.
Format of Data (20 points)	Poor Website is poorly formatted and not sectioned off by topic. Does not provide audience with clear and concise details on where to go for tools or information. No flash player included.	Fair Website is poorly formatted, but sectioned off by subject. Information is poorly organized and barely readable. Provides minimal tips to audience with clear and concise details on where to go for tools or information. Basic Flash player included.	Good Website is formatted and sectioned off by subject and information is organized in a readable format. Clear and to the point, easy to view and navigate. Provides many resources. One advanced Flash player included.	Excellent Website is formatted and sectioned off by subject and information is organized in a readable format. Target audience has many choices when viewing site, which enhance the viewing experience. Capable of viewing various interactive mediums including games, activities and discussion throughout entire site. Many Flash players included.
Quality of Data (20 points)	Poor Information is not helpful, interesting or off topic. Disorganization of writing dissuades the audience from reading. One of the following, the color, balance, proximity, contrast, focus, unity and visual identity detract from the purpose and keep the audience from viewing site.	Fair Information is somewhat unreadable and does not explain in detail the information that audience needs understand topic. Disorganization somewhat dissuades the audience from reading. Two of the following, the color, balance, proximity, contrast, focus, unity and visual identity some what entices the audience.	Good Information is helpful, interesting and to-the-point. Audience can pull information to help them in their own experience. Audience can research in some depth what the information is about. The color, balance, proximity, contrast, focus, unity and visual identity entices the audience.	Excellent Information is helpful, informative, interesting and to-the-point. Audience has many choices for researching additional information. Data found on site is clear and concise. The color, balance, proximity, contrast, focus, unity and visual identity strongly attract the audience.
Proposal (30 points)	Poor The planning tool is disorganized and incomplete; it does not contain one or more of the following: Title page, table of contents, site map, purpose, content pages for each webpage and references; it does not contain basic explanations about the content. APA format not followed.	Fair The planning tool is some what disorganized and incomplete; it does not contain one or more of the following or information within one of the following is incomplete: Title page, table of contents, site map, purpose, content pages for each webpage and references; it contains some basic explanations about the content. APA format somewhat followed. References included, but incomplete or inaccurate.	Good The planning tool is organized and complete; it is missing one of the following: Title page, table of contents, site map, purpose, content pages for each webpage and references; it explains how and why you built this website in some detail; it does contain basic explanations about the content. APA format followed. References complete and accurate with one or two errors.	Excellent The planning tool is well organized and complete; none of the required sections are missing; it explains in detail how and why you built this website in great detail; it contains detailed explanations about the content. APA format followed. References complete and accurate.

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric