iRubric: Rubric for 2011 Capstone Paper (Quality Improvement Resourc

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Rubric for 2011 Capstone Paper (Quality Improvement Resourc

Rubric Code: V5A263

By kayhaw

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Medical

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: (none)

Rubric for 2011 Capstone paper
	excellent 3 pts	Good 2 pts	Fair 1 pts	Unacceptable 0 pts
Outline	excellent Turned in on time (April 22, 2011)	Good 1 day late	Fair 2-3 days late	Unacceptable more than 3 days late
First draft	excellent Turned in on time (August 8, 2011)	Good 1 day late	Fair 2-3 days late	Unacceptable more than 3 days late
Final draft	excellent Turned in on time (Oct 14, 2011)	Good 1 day late	Fair 2-3 days late	Unacceptable more than 3 days late
First draft corrections	excellent All of the appropriated corrections were made on the final draft	Good 1 suggested correction was not made on the final draft	Fair 2 suggested corrections were not made on the final draft	Unacceptable 3 or more suggested corrections were not made on the final draft
Technically correct	excellent >14 pages Margins (L= 2”, all others = 1”)	Good 12-14 pages	Fair 10-12 pages	Unacceptable <10 pages
Technically correct	excellent Type=Times New Roman Font=12; subtitle=16 title=20;	Good Font OR any portion of font size not correct	Fair Font AND any portion of font size not correct	Unacceptable Font AND all of font sizes are not correct
Technically correct	excellent Titles aligned left Double-spaced	Good Titles not aligned left OR lines not double-spaced	Fair	Unacceptable Titles not aligned left AND lines not double spaced
Technnically correct	excellent Final draft pages numbered correctly using Arabic numbers in the upper right corner	Good Pages numbered in incorrect position	Fair Pages only partially numbered	Unacceptable No page numbering
Purpose	excellent Listed at the beginning of the chapter (1-2 sentences)	Good Listed at the beginning of the chapter but is too wordy, containing more than 3 sentences.	Fair	Unacceptable No "purpose" listed
References	excellent Minimum of 10 references in appropriate format	Good Minimum of 10 references, but inappropriate format	Fair 6-9 references in appropriate format	Unacceptable Less than 6 references, regardless of format
Chapter summary	excellent Separate page. Well worded to allow the reader a true summary of the chapter	Good Not on a separate page, but well worded	Fair Poorly constructed summary of the chapter	Unacceptable No summary
Grammar and spelling	excellent No more than 2 grammatical or spelling errors	Good 3-5 grammatical or spelling	Fair 6-10 grammatical or spelling errors	Unacceptable More than 10 spelling or grammatical errors
Tables and figures	excellent Tables and figures are used appropriately	Good One table or figure is used inappropriately or not included	Fair Two tables or figures are used inappropriately or not included	Unacceptable More than 3 table or figures are used inappropriately or not included
Double points
Overall Content	excellent Each chapter covers the primary point(s) as identified originally on “Capstone Chapter Divisions”	Good Good, but not comprehensive coverage of the chapter topic	Fair Weak coverage or presented in such a way that it is very difficult to understand the leading points	Unacceptable Primary points of the chapter are not covered at all
Overall Content	excellent Topic is covered in appropriate detail; does not override surrounding chapter’s concepts	Good Rather than focus on the primary topic of this chapter, other concepts are described in a distracting way	Fair Weak detail leaving too many questions of the primary topic. Reads as if the author is not fully knowledgeable of the topic.	Unacceptable Poor coverage of the primary topic such that the reader would not be able to use this resource to "learn" the topic.
Overall Content	excellent Flows well with surrounding chapters	Good Could be better transition, but it does appear the author was aware of the surrounding chapters.	Fair Weak transition	Unacceptable No transition. Reads as though it were a separate paper rather than a portion of a collected work
Effectiveness	excellent If I were beginning a QI project, this chapter would have clearly instructed a way to accomplish the process discussed within the chapter	Good The information would have fairly well instructed in the QI topic.	Fair Weak instruction in the QI process discussed.	Unacceptable This chapter would have been of no benefit in understanding the process of topic.

Subjects:

Medical

Types:

Writing

Discuss this rubric