Skip to main content

iRubric: Research Simulation Task extended rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Research Simulation Task extended 
Rubric Code: V2W2A4W
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
Enter rubric description
  Poor

1 pts

Fair

2 pts

Good

3 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Introduction

Enter description

Poor

__ dosen't contain hook/lead

__ no thesis statement

__ titles and topic are not stated
Fair

__ contains a hook/lead

__ has a thesis statement but doesn't address prompt

__titles or topic are stated
Good

__ contains an effective hook/lead

__has a clear thesis statement that addresses the task in the prompt

__ titles and topic is clearly stated
Excellent

__ contains an effective, interesting hook/lead

__ has a clear thesis statement that addresses the task in the prompt

__ titles and topic are clearly stated
Organization

Enter description

Poor

__essay is not structured with introduction, body and conclusion

__lacks good transition

__body paragraphs to not contain topic sentences
Fair

__essay is structured with less than 5 paragraphs but contains introduction, body paragraphs and conclusion

__ more appropriate transitions are needed

__some body paragraphs to not contain topic sentence that relates to thesis
Good

__ essay is structured into 5 body paragraphs (intro, 3 body paragraphs, and conclusion

__ some appropriate transitions

__ topic sentence for each body paragraph that relates to thesis
Excellent

__ essay is clearly structured into 5 paragraphs (intro, 3 body paragraphs-one for each source, and conclusion

__many appropriate transitions

__clear topic sentence for each body paragraph that relates to thesis
Development

Poor

__does not analyze impact of word choice on meaning/tone

__does not correctly identify the author's purpose

__summarizes the two texts
Fair

__notes the impact of word choice on meaning/tone

__Accurately explains the author's purpose/pov

__Analyzes how the authors shape their presentation of events
Good

__ accurately names an instance when word choice impacts meaning/tone

__Explains the author's pov/purpose and accurately explains how it is conveyed in the text

__Compares one author's presentation of events with that of another.
Excellent

__ accurately names and analyzes an instance when word choice impacts meaning/tone

__explains the author's purpose and accurately explains how the author distinguishes his or her position from that of the others

__Compares and evaluates the presentations of key information by emphasizing different evidence or advancing different interpretations of the facts
text evidence

Enter description

Poor

__no text evidence is used

__text evidence is missing

__text evidence is not followed by explanations
Fair

__little text evidence is used

__text evidence is somewhat irrelevant and doesn't support task

__explains an individual event or idea from the text
Good

__ some text evidence is used

__text evidence is mostly relevant and supports task

__analuzes how an element (event or idea) from the text helps to develop the central idea
Excellent

__ appropriate amount of text evidence is used

__ text evidence is relevant and supports task

__analyzes and explains how multiple elements from the text interact to develop the central idea
conclusion

Poor

__ no conclusion given

__no similarity between resources is stated

__no concluding thought is stated
Fair

__ the conclusion does not restate the task/title

__ a similarity between resources is stated unclearly

__conclusion contains a concluding thought
Good

__ the conclusion restates the task and titles

__ a similarity between resources is stated

__conclusion contains a provoking thought or suggestion
Excellent

__the conclusion restates __the task and titles in a clear manner

__any similarities between resources are clearly stated

__conclusion contains an interesting provoking thought or suggestion
Language/Style

Poor

__word choice is repetitive and wordy

__no descriptive words are used

__sentence structure in unvaried

__style is informal; written in first or second person
Fair

__some varied word choice; some wordiness

__descriptive words could be more effective

__sentence structure is unvaried

__formal style- a few first or second person statements/contractions
Good

__mostly varied and precise word choice

__descriptive words are somewhat effective

__sentence structure is somewhat varied

__formal style is mostly used
Excellent

__ word choice is varied and precise

__descriptive words are used effectively

__sentence structure is varied. Many types of sentences are used

__formal style is used- no first or second person/contractions
Grammar

Poor

__consistent distracting errors in spelling in spelling and punctuation

__consistent errors in grammar and usage

__meaning is unclear
Fair

__multiple errors in spelling and punctuation

__many errors in grammar and usage

__meaning is occasionally unclear
Good

__a few distracting errors in spelling and punctuation

__writing mostly demonstrates proper English grammar and usage

__meaning is mostly clear
Excellent

__few or no errors in spelling, punctuation, or capitalization

__writing demonstrates proper English grammar and usage

__meaning is clear




Subjects:

Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n203