iRubric: NaK2Cl Cotransporter rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

NaK2Cl Cotransporter

'Grading our micro-teaching sessions

Rubric Code: V2B2BW

By kngilkes

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Biology

Type: Assignment

Grade Levels: 9-12

Independent Learning
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Bakground Information	Poor - No background information - Poor conceptual knowledge, connections are not made - Key facts are not represented - No use of technology, or technology is used inappropriately	Fair - Some background information - Some conceptual knowledge, some connections are stated explicitly - Some key facts are represented - Some use of technology, or inappropriate use of technology	Good -Adequate background information - Adequate conceptual knowledge, not all connections are stated explicitly - Most key facts are represented - Sufficient use of available technology	Excellent - Strong background information - Good conceptual knowledge - Represents key facts independently - Adequate and appropriate use of available technology
Class Incorporation into Learning	Poor - No students are engaged in independent learning, all students are off task - Task is unclear and no direction is given - Students are given no guidance	Fair - Lessons involves few students in independent learning, most students are off task and confused - Students are given little guidance	Good - Lesson involves most students in independent learning, few students are off task - Task is presented needing some clarification - Students are given some guidance	Excellent - Lesson completely involves all students in independent learning - Clearly presented task - Students are given all necessary guidance
Quality of Questions	Poor - Questions are closed ended that do not promote inquiry by the student - Questions are unclear, confusing, and purpose is undistinguishable - Questions do not evoke any learning or thinking	Fair - Some guided questions with no connections - Few questions are open ended and hinder further inquiry - Questions are unclear for most learners - Questions evoke poor thinking	Good - Guided questions, with unclear connections - Some questions are open ended, some are directed and hinder further inquiry - Questions are clear and understandable for most learners - Questions evoke some higher level thinking	Excellent - Well thought out, guided questions - Questions are open ended and promote inquiry by the students - Questions are clear and easily understandable for all learners - Questions evoke both lower and higher level thinking
Reintigration of Knowledge	Poor - Information is poor - Research is incomplete and inadequate - Knowledge is unorganized, and not represented to the students - Misconceptions are ignored or addressed inappropriately	Fair - Information is satisfactory - Research is complete, many details are missing or incorrect - Knowledge is poorly organized - Misconceptions are addressed poorly and not corrected	Good - Information is adequate - Research is mostly complete, few key details are missing or incorrect - Knowledge is represented and organized in a simple way, organization is rudimentary - Misconceptions are addressed but with little correction	Excellent - Information is comprehensive - Research was complete - Knowledge is represented in an organized and easily understandable way - Misconceptions are addressed appropriately and corrected

Subjects:

Biology

Types:

Assignment

Discuss this rubric