iRubric: Webquest evaluation rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Webquest evaluation

United Nations Mission in conflict areas

Rubric Code: V24X87C

By llekuona

Draft

Public Rubric

Subject: Social Sciences

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

TEAM WORK DURING THE PROCESS 35 %
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 1 pts
Use of the time	Excellent They have made good use of the school time. They focused on the work all the time.	Good They have usually made good use of the school time. They focused on the work all the time.	Fair They have usually made good use of the school time. They sometimes became distracted.	Poor They wasted class time and were generally not focused on the task.
Working with the information	Excellent They have chosen, quoted and used a variety of sources, writing together coherent texts.	Good They have chosen, quoted and used some (2/3) sources, writing together coherent texts.	Fair They have chosen, quoted from and used sources, but have failed to re-formulate the texts.	Poor They have failed to choose and quote from sources and have not reformulated the information.
Preparing the writing	Excellent They have checked each part of the work and corrected the drafts.	Good They have checked each part of the work and corrected most of the drafts.	Fair They have checked some part of the works or/and corrected most of the drafts.	Poor They have checked and correct very little of the work.
Group work	Excellent The group work has been carried out successfully. The tasks distributed have worked and the coordination between members has been successful.	Good The group work atmosphere, the relationships and the tasks distribution has been good.	Fair Each member has worked, but there has been no real group coordination.	Poor Some members have failed to do the work, and the coordination has been unsuccessful.
Individual work in the group	Excellent Fully contribution within the group. Encouraged and supported others. Completed own tasks in exemplary fashion. Overcame barriers.	Good Good contribution to the team. Some encouragement and support to others.Accepted responsibility for own share of the work.	Fair Fair contribution to the task. Worked acceptably with others, could have been a more active team member and enhanced the output of the group.	Poor Little or no contribution to the output of the group. Poor attitude towards the task. Held the work of the group back.
MULTIMEDIA PRESENTATION 45 %
	Excellent 10 pts	Good 8 pts	Fair 6 pts	Poor 3 pts
Report demands	Excellent The report includes all the relevant points.(conflict, causes, consequences, bibliography…). The significant information is written in a coherent and accurate way.	Good The report includes most of the relevant points. The significant information is written in a coherent way.	Fair The report does not include all the relevant points, or just too little information.	Poor The report includes hardly any of the relevant points Not enough information in practical terms.
Presentation	Excellent The slides included relevant illustrations, attractive design, clear and concise explanation of the subject, and were attractively presented.	Good The slides included usually relevant and useful information in practical terms, but less clear in the explanation. Usually well presented.	Fair The slides contain relevant but not always useful information in practical terms and/ or the presentation is inadequate.	Poor Few slides that contain relevant illustrations, not all issues covered.. Lacks coherence and is poorly presented.
Spelling & Grammar	Excellent The report is well written, with few spelling or grammatical errors.	Good The report is generally well written, with spelling or grammatical errors but which do not spoil the overall effect.	Fair Adequately written, but with numerous spelling or grammatical errors.	Poor Poorly written, with many spelling and grammatical errors.
Use of multimedia resources	Excellent Attractive presentation that incorporates many technical aspects of PowerPoint ( background, graphics, animation, color, pictures, tables, sounds,...)	Good Attractive presentation with appropriate use of the Power Point presentation thatincorporates some technical aspects.	Fair Limited used of the Power point presentation possibilities.Incorporates few technical aspects.	Poor Poor use of the multimedia presentation possibilities.
Creativity (Solutions)	Excellent The ideas included are original, not taken directly from the information given.	Good Most of the ideas are original, but there are a few taken directly from the information given.	Fair Some of the ideas are original, but most are taken directly from the information given.	Poor Few or none of the ideas are original.
ORAL PRESENTATION 20 %
	Excellent 5 pts	Good 4 pts	Fair 3 pts	Poor 1 pts
Presentation to schoolmates	Excellent The work done has been presented in an attractive way by each member, with extra information added to the multimedia report.The format and wording of their report is significantly different from what they read. Students creatively incorporate information from all areas of expertise…Manage to answer the questions from the audience. Structured presentation.	Good The work done has been presented correctly by all the members, with extra information added to the multimedia report.The format and wording or the report is significantly different from what they read, well-organised presentation, with many examples and explanations.	Fair The multimedia report has been presented correctly by all the members.The presentation are not very appealing. Overall impression lacks finish.	Poor The multimedia report has been presented poorly . Relevant information is not included and they haven’t been able to answer the audience’s enquiries.
Pronunciation	Excellent Speaks clearly, looks at the audience, signals thematic changes and emphasizes the key content by appropriate use of intonation and language.Pronounces the countries, people and key vocabulary correctly.	Good Speaks clearly, looks at the audience, signals thematic changes and emphasizes most of the key content by appropriate use of intonation and language.Pronounces the countries, people and key vocabulary correctly, but not always.	Fair Speaks acceptably, and looks at the audience, sometimes signaling thematic changes and key content by occasional use of intonation and language.Inconsistent in pronunciation of the countries, people and key vocabulary. L1 interference impedes comprehension of message.	Poor Speaks poorly, and only looks at the audience occasionally. The speech seems too practiced, rarely signaling thematic changes. Key content is presented in the same way as other content.Pronunciation of the countries etc almost always defective, and based almost entirely on L1 patterns.
Group management	Excellent Presentation takes place smoothly, with individual roles both practiced and clearly differentiated. Each presenter makes his own role and information clear, but acknowledges the contributions and facts of the others’.Presentation is balanced, with all 3 delegates contributing equally.	Good Presentation takes place quite smoothly, with individual roles both practiced and clearly differentiated. Each presenter makes his own role and information clear, but there are occasional lapses in the flow.Presentation is balanced, with all 3 delegates contributing equally.	Fair Presentation takes place, but individual roles are not so clearly differentiated. Each presenter provides his/her information, but fails to link it significantly either to the others’ contributions or to the general themes. The presentation is less balanced, with one or two contributing more than another.	Poor Presentation takes place, but individual roles are not differentiated. Each presenter provides his/her information, but fails to link it significantly either to the others’ contributions or to the general themes. The presentation is unbalanced, with all three contributions of differing length.

Keywords:

Webquest, conflict

Subjects:

Social Sciences

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric