Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: AP SpLit FRQ 3- Modified Single Text Analysis (Context) rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
AP SpLit FRQ 3- Modified Single Text Analysis (Context)
AP Spanish Lit Question #3- Single Text Analysis
AP Spanish Literature Single Text Analysis
Rubric Code:
V242A57
By
ElQuisqueyano
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Foreign Languages
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Single Text Analysis
Demonstrates Superiority
5 pts
Demonstrates Competence
4 pts
Suggests Competence
3 pts
Suggests Lack of Competence
2 pts
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
1 pts
Contextual Knowledge
Demonstrates Superiority
Clearly analyzes how the text represents the cultural context. Analyzes how cultural products, practices, or perspectives found in the text reflect the given cultural context.
Demonstrates Competence
Analyzes how the text represents the cultural context. Explains how cultural products, practices, or perspectives found in the text relate to the given cultural context.
Suggests Competence
Attempts to analyze how the text represents the cultural context. Identifies cultural products, practices, or perspectives of the given cultural context found in the text.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Shows little ability to analyze how the text represents the cultural context. May not clearly identify cultural products, practices, or perspectives of the given cultural context found in the text.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Inaccurate and insufficient; there is no attempt to analyze how the text represents the cultural context. Demonstrates lack of understanding of the text, or cultural products, practices, or perspectives of given cultural context.
Literary Features
Demonstrates Superiority
Effectively discusses a variety of rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features.
Demonstrates Competence
Discusses rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text.
Suggests Competence
Describes some rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text.
Suggests Lack of Competence
May not clearly identify rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
May not identify rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text.
Organization
Demonstrates Superiority
Includes an explicit statement of purpose (thesis), a coherent structure, and a cohesive and logical progression of ideas in a well-developed response.
Demonstrates Competence
Includes an explicit statement of purpose (thesis), a coherent structure, and a logical progression of ideas.
Suggests Competence
Includes a statement of purpose (thesis), evidence of organization (a stated topic, and a logical progression of ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence
May not clearly state a purpose or be organized around a central idea or argument; progression of ideas may not be logical.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Does not state a purpose, show evidence of organization, or offer a progression of ideas.
Textual Examples
Demonstrates Superiority
Supports analysis by integrating specific, well-chosen textual examples throughout the essay.
Demonstrates Competence
Supports analysis with appropriate textual examples.
Suggests Competence
Elaborates on main points and supports observations by citing examples; however, the examples may not always be clear and relevant.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Presents main points and some details, describes basic elements of the text, but may do so without examples or supporting an argument.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
May consist entirely of summary or paraphrasing of the text without examples relevant to the Movement, Period, (sub-)Genre, or Technique or the given cultural context.
Balance and Focus
Demonstrates Superiority
Response has a clearly balanced focus that includes analysis of the text, the context, and the Period, Movement, (sub-)Genre, or Technique.
Demonstrates Competence
Response has a reasonably balanced focus that includes analysis of the text, the context, and the Period, Movement, (sub-)Genre, or Technique.
Suggests Competence
Response attempts to have a balanced focus that includes analysis of the text, the context, and the Period, Movement, (sub-)Genre, or Technique. If the response has a significantly unbalanced focus, the analysis must be good to achieve this score.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Response has a significantly unbalanced focus on either the text, specified Period, Movement, (sub-)Genre, or Technique, or the given context.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Demonstrates lack of understanding and has a significantly unbalanced focus on either the text, specified Period, Movement, (sub-)Genre, or Technique, or the given context.
Language Use- Vocabulary
Demonstrates Superiority
Vocabulary is varied and appropriate to the text(s) being discussed, presents main ideas and supporting details, and communicates some nuances of meaning.
Demonstrates Competence
Vocabulary is appropriate to the text(s) being discussed, and presents
main ideas and some supporting details.
Suggests Competence
Vocabulary is appropriate to the text(s) being discussed, but may be limited to presenting some relevant ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Vocabulary may be inappropriate to the text(s) being discussed, and forces the reader to supply inferences.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Vocabulary is insufficient and inappropriate to the text(s) being discussed; errors render comprehension difficult.
Language Use- Grammar
Demonstrates Superiority
Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is very good; use of verb tenses and moods is generally accurate; word order and formation are accurate; use of cohesive devices and transitional elements or both is appropriate to guide understanding.
Demonstrates Competence
Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is good; occasional errors in the use of verb tenses and moods do not detract from understanding; word order and formation are mostly accurate.
Suggests Competence
Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is adequate; errors in the use of verb tenses and moods may be frequent but do not detract from overall understanding; word order and formation are generally accurate.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is weak; errors in verb forms, word order, and formation are numerous and serious enough to impede comprehension at times.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is inadequate; errors in verb forms, word order, and formation are nearly constant and impede comprehension frequently.
Language Use- Writing Conventions
Demonstrates Superiority
Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation, paragraphing) are generally accurate; paragraphing shows grouping and progression of ideas.
Demonstrates Competence
Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation, paragraphing) are generally accurate; occasional errors do not detract from understanding; paragraphing shows grouping and progression<BR>
of ideas.
Suggests Competence
Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation, paragraphing) are sometimes accurate; numerous errors do not detract from overall understanding; paragraphing shows grouping of ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation, paragraphing) are generally inaccurate; errors are numerous and serious enough to impede comprehension at times; paragraphing may not show grouping of ideas.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation, paragraphing) are inaccurate; errors are nearly constant and impede comprehension frequently; there may be little or no evidence of paragraphing.
Keywords:
spanish literature text analysis
Subjects:
Foreign Languages
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Foreign Languages rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.