Skip to main content
iRubric: Final Written Work rubric

iRubric: Final Written Work rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Final Written Work 
Rubric Code: V228433
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Science  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Written Work Rubric
  Excellent

5 pts

Very Good

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Content

Excellent

Your contributions are clear and in a logical sequence. Ideas and arguments presented by you are supporting your claims.
Very complete information; no more can be said; thorough, relevant; on target
Very Good

Some of your contributions are not clear.Your arguments and poor and they are not supporting your claims.
Complete information; some development of ideas; some ideas lack supporting detail or evidence.
Good

It is possible to perceive your contributions, even though they are not very clear and logical.
Adequate information; ideas present but not developed; lack of detail.
Fair

It is not possible to distinguish your contributions from the information presented.Ideas and arguments are missing.
Limited information; information lacks detail; inappropriate.
Poor

There are no contributions by your side.The Written Work lacks of your inputs and there are no ideas or arguments presented by you.
Minimal information; information lacks detail; irrelevant information.
Organization

Excellent

All of the items are fully developed in a clear sequence. The ICMP's Objective is in line with the Company's mission, the identification of stakeholders and the actions in the Plan.
Logically and effectively ordered; main points and details are connected; fluent; not choppy whatsoever.
Very Good

All of the items are developed. The ICMP's Objective is clear and logically connected to the identification of stakeholders and the actions of the Plan.
An apparent order is intended; main points do stand out although sequencing of ideas is not complete.
Good

Not all of the items are fully developed. The ICMP's Objective is not clear or not being in line with the Company's mission. The identification of stakeholders is not accurate. The actions in the Plan are not communication actions.
Adequate order to the content; lacks logical sequencing; disjointed.
Fair

Not all of the items are developed. The ICMP's Objective is not clear and it is not in line with the Company's mission. Insufficient Identification of the stakeholders.The actions of the Plan are no communication actions.
Limited order to the content; lacks logical sequencing of ideas; ineffective ordering; very choppy; disjointed.
Poor

There are some items missing.The ICMP's Objective is not original. Identification of stakeholders and Plan's actions are disconnected. Actions in the Plan are not communication actions.
Series of separate sentences with no transitions; ideas are disconnected; ineffective ordering; or incomplete.
Vocabulary

Excellent

Broad; impressive; effective word use; extensive use of words studied; no misspellings.
Very Good

Complete; some incorrect word use but meaning is not lost; use of words studied; no misspellings
Good

Adequate; some incorrect word use but meaning is not lost; use of words studied; few spelling errors.
Fair

Incorrect use of words confuses meaning; several spelling errors.
Poor

Inadequate; wrong use or lack of words studied; many spelling errors.
Grammar

Excellent

No errors in grammar, syntax and spelling.
Very Good

Rare errors in grammar, syntax or spelling.
Good

Some errors in grammar, syntax or spelling.
Fair

Many errors in grammar, syntax and spelling.
Poor

Illegible with very little grammatical structure.
Use of Information

Excellent

It is possible to identify your own contributions and the information take from a different source. All citations are carefully done, taking into account APA citation's style.
Very Good

Information taken from another source is correctly tagged in your text. Citations are properly identified. It is possible to see the use of the APA citation's style.
Good

In some passages is not possible to distinguish your contributions from the information taken from another source. Some citations are not properly tagged. APA citation's style is rarely used.
Fair

It is not possible to distinguish your contributions from other information. Citations are not properly tagged. APA citation's style is not used.
Poor

There are no use of any citation's style whatsoever.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16