Skip to main content
iRubric: Architect / Construction Management Rating Scale rubric

iRubric: Architect / Construction Management Rating Scale rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Architect / Construction Management Rating Scale 
Interview rubric for architect/contruction management firms
Rubric Code: UXW5WCX
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Architect/Construction Management
  Poor

1 pts

Below Average

2 pts

Fair

3 pts

Above Average

4 pts

Exceptional

5 pts

Training, specialized experience

Competency of partners and associates demonstrated with the district or elsewhere with services desired by district.

Poor

Candidate has no training or specialized experience with desired services
Below Average

Candidate has little training or specialized experience with desired services
Fair

Candidate has some training or specialized experience with desired services
Above Average

Candidate has adequate training or specialized experience with desired services
Exceptional

Candidate has extensive training or specialized experience with desired services
Planning

Ability, efficiency, and promptness of the firm to perform the tasks requested

Poor

Candidate has no capacity or capability to perform tasks requested within the time limitations for project completion
Below Average

Candidate has little capacity or capability to perform tasks requested within the time limitations for project completion
Fair

Candidate has some capacity or capability to perform tasks requested within the time limitations for project completion
Above Average

Candidate has adequate capacity or capability to perform tasks requested within the time limitations for project completion
Exceptional

Candidate has exceptional capacity or capability to perform tasks requested within the time limitations for project completion
Educational Specification

Demonstrate educational specifications writing, to include accuracy and sufficiency of detail

Poor

Candidate has no educational specifications required for accuracy and detail
Below Average

Candidate has little educational specifications required for accuracy and detail
Fair

Candidate has some educational specifications required for accuracy and detail
Above Average

Candidate has adequate educational specifications required for accuracy and detail
Exceptional

Candidate has exceptional educational specifications required for accuracy and detail
Job Inspection

Inspection of job effectiveness to include analysis of past record performance of the firm with respect to control costs, quality work, design, appearance, utility and meet time schedules

Poor

Candidate has no job effectiveness which includes cost control, quality of work, design, appearance, and abiltiy to meet time requirements
Below Average

Candidate has little job effectiveness which includes cost control, quality of work, design, appearance, and abiltiy to meet time requirements
Fair

Candidate has some job effectiveness which includes cost control, quality of work, design, appearance, and abiltiy to meet time requirements
Above Average

Candidate has adequate job effectiveness which includes cost control, quality of work, design, appearance, and abiltiy to meet time requirements
Exceptional

Candidate has exceptional job effectiveness which includes cost control, quality of work, design, appearance, and abiltiy to meet time requirements
Geographical Location

Poor

Candidate demonstrated no familiarity or proximity with the geographical area in which the project shall be located
Below Average

Candidate demonstrated little familiarity or proximity with the geographical area in which the project shall be located
Fair

Candidate demonstrated some familiarity or proximity with the geographical area in which the project shall be located
Above Average

Candidate demonstrated adequate familiarity or proximity with the geographical area in which the project shall be located
Exceptional

Candidate demonstrated exceptional familiarity or proximity with the geographical area in which the project shall be located
Construction Management
  Poor

1 pts

N/A

0 pts

Fair

3 pts

N/A

0 pts

Exceptional

5 pts

Fee Schedule

Poor

Candidate has expensive fee schedules for construction management
N/A
Fair

Candidate has reasonalbe fee schedules for construction management
N/A
Exceptional

Candidate has inexpensive fee schedules for construction management










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98