iRubric: Grade 11 TDJ Culminating rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Grade 11 TDJ Culminating

Students act as architects hired to design a home for clients they determine. Students use the design process to create plans for a house using CAD accompanied by a written report that includes research and analysis of their final design.

Rubric Code: UXB9C3B

By Kathyama59

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Engineering

Type: Project

Grade Levels: 9-12

Grade 11 TDJ Culminating
	Excellent (80-100) (N/A)	Good (70-79) (N/A)	Satisfactory ( 60-69) (N/A)	Needs Improvement (50-59) (N/A)
Research (T) Client Profile, location, innovation & gen research 15%	Excellent (80-100) Thoughtful & relevant research with comments was completed & included in the presentation software. All required kinds of research are included: client, location, technology and other needed research. 14	Good (70-79) Relevant research with comments was completed & and included in the presentation software. All required kinds of research are included: client, location, technology and other needed research. 11	Satisfactory ( 60-69) Some research with some comments was completed & and included in the presentation software. Most required kinds of research are included: client, location, technology and other needed research. 10	Needs Improvement (50-59) Little research with few or no comments was completed & and included in the presentation software. Not all required kinds of research are included: client, location, technology and other needed research. 8
Design Process (T) Working Drawings, 2D plans & layouts, brainstorming notes, etc. 15%	Excellent (80-100) The design process/loop, including design refinement & improvements in process can be clearly tracked though working drawings, 2D plans, and other process work. 14	Good (70-79) The design process/loop can be tracked though working drawings, 2D plans, and other process work. 11	Satisfactory ( 60-69) The design process/loop can be tracked with gaps, though working drawings, 2D plans, and other process work.10	Needs Improvement (50-59) There is through process work to track the design process. 8
CAD/Prototype Construction (A) Your CAD or 3D actual model 20%	Excellent (80-100) CAD is built structurally sound. Evidence of accurate use of CAD tools. Well proportioned architectural features and consideration of how the design interacts with its environment. The prototype is built structurally sound. Evidence of accurate and experienced use of building tools for modelmaking. Well proportioned, ergonomic features and consideration of how the design interacts with the user. 18	Good (70-79) Model is structurally solid. Ability to use tools and materials correctly. Some consideration of how the design interacts with its environment. The prototype is built structurally sound. Evidence of accurate use of building tools for modelmaking. Some evidence of well proportioned, ergonomic features and some consideration of how the design interacts with the user. 16	Satisfactory ( 60-69) Model is fairly solid. Ability to use tools and materials correctly is evident. Little consideration of how the design interacts with its environment. The prototype is built structurally sound. Evidence of some use of building tools for modelmaking. Some evidence of well proportioned, ergonomic features and some consideration of how the design interacts with the user. 13	Needs Improvement (50-59) Difficulty working with the Software and constructing the house as desired. No consideration of the house's relation to the environment. The prototype has at least one structural design flaw. Very little evidence of the accurate use of building tools for modelmaking. Little consideration of well proportioned, ergonomic features and little consideration of how the design interacts with the user. 11
Size, scale, labels, explanation(K) Labels & explanations for plan drawings done in Sketchup or other 20%	Excellent (80-100) Your design meets client needs in size, room use, layout, style, decoration and sustainability. Geography and climate were thoroughly considered in the design The CAD file is accurate and indicates size & scale and is complete with labels and well written and insightful explanations. 18	Good (70-79) Your design meets client needs in size, room use, layout, room use, style, decoration and sustainability with some geographical consideration The CAD file is accurate and indicates size & scale and is complete with labels and explanations for the most part. 16	Satisfactory ( 60-69) Your design begins to meet client needs in size, room use, layout, room use, style, decoration and sustainability. Geography and climate were considered. The CAD file is fairly accurate and indicates size & scale and is complete with labels and some explanations. 13	Needs Improvement (50-59) Your design meets few of the client needs in size, room use, layout, room use, style, decoration and sustainability. Geography and climate were not considered The CAD file has many inaccuracies and indicates size & scale at times, but labels and explanations are missing. 11
Environmental Considerations (A) How your house/invention includes green tech 10%	Excellent (80-100) Many environmental considerations are brought into the design and construction of the house or invention and are an integral part of the model. 9	Good (70-79) Some environmental considerations are brought into the design and construction of the house or invention. e.g. materials, R values, siting, resource management, sustainability, green construction methodology, appliances, thermostats, renewable resources. 7.5	Satisfactory ( 60-69) Hardly any environmental considerations are brought into the design and construction of the house or invention.6.5	Needs Improvement (50-59) No environmental considerations are brought into the design and construction of the house or invention. 5.5
Presentation software (C) Submitted in Adobe Spark, Google slide or Site 10%	Excellent (80-100) All work is submitted through the presentation and all elements were present and illustrated with images & photos of work to support written text. The layout was well balanced and made it easy to understand the designs being shared and the design process. 9	Good (70-79) All work is submitted through the presentation and all elements were present with some images & photos of work to support written text. The layout was well balanced and made it easy to understand the designs being shared and the design process for the most part. 7.5	Satisfactory ( 60-69) Most work is submitted through the presentation and all elements were present with few images & photos of work to support written text. The layout included some designs and some of the design process. 6.5	Needs Improvement (50-59) Some work is submitted through the presentation and some elements were missing with few or no images & photos of work to support written text. The layout include few designs and little of the design process.5.5
Concluding statement (T) Your final thoughts 10%	Excellent (80-100) The final word and self-evaluation showed strong insight to the strengths and weakness of the plans submitted and touched on possible solutions. Self-reflection on the design process and comments about what was learned by the designer was also presented. 9	Good (70-79) The final word and self-evaluation showed very insight to the strengths and weakness of the plans submitted and touched on possible solutions. There is some evidence of self-reflection about the design process. 7.5	Satisfactory ( 60-69) The final word and self-evaluation showed some insight to the strengths and weakness of the plans submitted. Most of the work is complete. 6.5	Needs Improvement (50-59) The final word and self-evaluation showed very little insight to the strengths and weakness of the plans submitted. Work was incomplete or missing. 5.5

Keywords:

Architecture

Subjects:

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric