iRubric: Charity-Part Two rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Charity-Part Two

Students will research a charity and explain how that charity relates to their previously researched world issue. They will also persuade me why this is the best charity for their cause.

Rubric Code: UX9X22

By bbevel1

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Writing

Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12, Undergraduate

Charity Description
	Unacceptable 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 4 pts
Description	Unacceptable No effort was put in this at all. Many items are missing and very little is explained.	Poor Explanation is sparse and/or no examples for some topics, and/or more than one topic is missing	Fair One topic is missing or something is not elaborated.	Good Who are they, what do they do, and how do they do it is all addressed and elaborated on with specific examples.
Persuasiveness	Unacceptable All informative and no or very little reasons for me to believe this is a good charity.	Poor I felt informed but not persuaded to do anything or even know what really to do.	Fair By the end of this paper, I felt I understood the charity and felt some sympathy but was not fully invested.	Good By the end of this paper, I felt that I wanted to donate because my emotions were really invested. Many examples were used to tug my heart or make me angry enough to do something about it.
Organizational Efficiency	Unacceptable More than two are missing	Poor Two items are missing	Fair One item is missing	Good Organizational Efficiency: lists how money is spent such as fundraising efficiency, fundraising expenses, program expenses, and administrative expenses. Give an overall rating.
Organizational Capacity	Unacceptable More than two items are missing	Poor Two items aremissing	Fair One item is missing	Good The three key indicators are listed which determine how well a charity can sustain its efforts over time: average annual growth of primary revenue, average annual growth of program expenses, and working capital ratio. Overall rating is also given
Expenses	Unacceptable No information given.	Poor	Fair	Good Expenditures total and broken down if available.
Works Cited	Unacceptable Some information is not cited and/or major mistakes throughout.	Poor All information gathered is cited in proper format but with some major mistakes.	Fair All information gathered is cited in proper format with a few minor mistakes.	Good All information gathered is cited in proper format.