Skip to main content
iRubric: The Kite Runner Character/Relationship Analysis rubric

iRubric: The Kite Runner Character/Relationship Analysis rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
The Kite Runner Character/Relationship Analysis 
Rubric Code: UX7988A
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Reading  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Character Analysis
  4 (80%+)

(N/A)

3 (70-79%)

(N/A)

2 (60-69%)

(N/A)

1 (50-59%)

(N/A)

F

(N/A)

Interpretation

4 (80%+)

Interpretation of the character's or relationship's traits are accurate and is based on logical and insightful reasons and textual references
3 (70-79%)

Interpretation of the characer's or relationship's traits are accurate and based on logical reasons and textual references
2 (60-69%)

Interpretation of the character's or relationship's traits are mostly accurate. Textual references or reasons may be based on insufficient textual references
1 (50-59%)

Interpretation of the character's or relationship's traits are inaccurate and based on random reasons or textual references
F

Does not meet criteria
Supporting Evidence

4 (80%+)

The evidence strongly and insightfully supports the interpretation. Evidence is clearly stated and more than two citations to the text.
3 (70-79%)

The evidence accurately supports the interpretation. Two citations are included, but not always clearly connected to the interpretation
2 (60-69%)

The evidence somewhat supports the interpretation. Two citations are sometimes included to support the interpretation and connection to the interpertation is not always clear.
1 (50-59%)

The evidence does not clearly support the interpretation. Less than two citations are random or not included to support the interpretation
F

Does not meet criteria
Introduction

4 (80%+)

Introduction grabs the readers attention and includes a strong and concise thesis
3 (70-79%)

Introduction tells about character/relationship but does not flow together smoothly.
2 (60-69%)

Introduction lacks overview and creativity.
1 (50-59%)

Introduction very basic with no supporting information or evidence.
F

Does not meet criteria
Mechanics/APA format

4 (80%+)

Fewer than three mechanical errors. All APA format criteria met.
3 (70-79%)

Fewer than five mechanical errors. All APA format criteria met.
2 (60-69%)

Mechanical errors interfere with effectiveness of paper.
APA format criteria used.
1 (50-59%)

Mechanical errors interfere with readability of paper. Little or no APA format criteria used.
F

Does not meet criteria
Conclusion

4 (80%+)

Includes a clear rewording / rephrasing of thesis. Reviews main points discussed in the body paragraphs. Adequately answers the "So what?"
3 (70-79%)

Includes a rewording/ rephrasing of thesis. Reviews main points discussed in the body paragraphs. Attempts to answer the "So what?"
2 (60-69%)

Restates thesis and main points without rewording.
Attempts to answer the "So what?"
1 (50-59%)

Either thesis or main points are missing. Th response to the "so what?" is very unclear.
F

Does not meet criteria




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n98