iRubric: Unit Guide | Document Team rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Unit Guide | Document Team

The Document Team must present their unit guide as a document. Each member of the document team must define, describe, discuss, explain and/or identify their assigned unit guide terms. You must consider the prompts who, what, when where, why, and how as you discuss each term on your part of the unit guide. You must place the number of the term, and the term and related sub-terms (bold/underlined) on your document. Use a “simple font” (10 point|single-spaced within answer|double-spaced between terms). You must attach a “Works Cited” section at the end of your completed document. You must utilize at least two sources per term. You may not use the same source more than twice for your portion of the assignment. In addition to an individual grade for the research and the finished document, each student on the document team will earn a team collaboration grade. The team collaboration grade will be based on how effectively you perform your role as a member of your team.

Rubric Code: UX6WBXW

By kelenim

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: History

Type: Project

Grade Levels: (none)

Unit Guide \| Document Team
	Outstanding (N/A)	Excellent (N/A)	High Achievement (N/A)	Satisfactory (N/A)	Minimal Achievement (N/A)	Unsatisfactory (N/A)	NOTES: (N/A)
Historical \| Factual Detail Quality of Factual Detail \| Depth \| Degree of Linkage of Detail to Unit Topic	Outstanding Specific, illustrative and supportive historical/ factual detail, both exceptional and concise with regard to depth, each term is, through entirely relevant detail, linked to the unit of study	Excellent Specific and supportive historical/factual detail, excellent with regard to depth, each term is, through relevant detail, linked to the unit of study	High Achievement Adequate historical/factual detail, sufficient with regard to depth, each term is, through mostly relevant detail, linked to the unit of study	Satisfactory Limited historical/factual detail, superficial with regard to depth, most terms are, through mostly relevant detail, linked to the unit of study	Minimal Achievement Distinctly underdeveloped historical/factual detail, superficial with regard to depth, some terms are, through insufficiently relevant detail, minimally linked to the unit of study	Unsatisfactory Distinctly underdeveloped or incomplete historical/factual detail, lacking with regard to depth, terms are, insufficiently linked to the unit of study	NOTES: __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________
Historical \| Factual Detail Degree of Accuracy \| Completeness of Factual Information	Outstanding Extensively developed definition/description/ discussion/explanation/ identification of terms, completely accurate with regard to historical/factual information	Excellent Fully developed definition/description/ discussion/explanation/ identification of term(s), accurate with regard to historical/factual information	High Achievement Sufficiently developed definition/description/ discussion/explanation/ identification of terms, mostly accurate with regard to historical/factual information	Satisfactory Partially developed definition/description/ discussion/explanation/ identification of terms, somewhat inaccurate with regard to historical/factual information	Minimal Achievement Vague and/or confused definition/description/ discussion/explanation/ identification of terms, inaccurate with regard to historical/factual information	Unsatisfactory Inaccurate and/or incomplete definition/description/ discussion/explanation/ identification of terms, distinct inaccuracy with regard to historical/factual information	NOTES: __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________
Subject Knowledge Demonstrated Knowledge of Subject \| Topic \| Assignment Requirements	Outstanding Specific, illustrative, supportive, and extensively developed detail, demonstrates a complete understanding of the various terms and their connection to the topic of study	Excellent Specific, supportive, and fully developed detail, demonstrates a thorough understanding of the various terms and their connection to the topic of study	High Achievement Adequate, and sufficiently developed detail, demonstrates a good understanding of the various terms and their connection to the topic of study	Satisfactory Limited, and partially developed detail, demonstrates a partial understanding of the various terms and/or their connection to the topic of study	Minimal Achievement Underdeveloped, vague, confusing detail, demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the various terms and/or their connection to the topic of study	Unsatisfactory Underdeveloped, inaccurate and/or incomplete detail, demonstrates a distinct lack of effort and understanding of the various terms and/or their connection to the topic of study	NOTES: __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________
Mechanics \| Conventions Spelling \| Grammar \| Sentence-Paragraph Structure \| Citations	Outstanding No grammatical/ mechanical errors, outstanding effort with regard to spelling, clear, concise sentence-paragraph structure, citations are varied, and perfectly formatted	Excellent No significant grammatical/ mechanical errors, excellent effort with regard to spelling, clear, concise sentence-paragraph structure, citations are varied, and properly formatted	High Achievement Few, if any, grammatical/ mechanical and/or spelling errors, sufficient clarity, of sentence-paragraph structure and word usage, citations are sufficiently formatted	Satisfactory Grammatical/ mechanical and/or spelling errors interfere somewhat with understanding, faulty sentence-paragraph structure evident, citation formatting needs to be improved	Minimal Achievement Repeated grammatical/ mechanical and/or spelling errors profoundly interfere with understanding, unsatisfactory sentence-paragraph structure and/or word usage evident, citations missing or mostly improperly formatted	Unsatisfactory Distinctly underdeveloped or incomplete unit guide demonstrates a lack of effort. Meaningful evaluation of mechanics and conventions not possible, citations missing or mostly improperly formatted	NOTES: __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________
Sources Degree of Organization \| Effective Use of Sources	Outstanding Logical, sophisticated organization of content, exceptional depth and completely accurate historical/factual information indicates extensive use of sources, sources used effectively rather than copied	Excellent Logical, thorough organization of content, excellent depth and accurate historical/factual information indicates use of a variety of sources, sources used effectively rather than copied	High Achievement Sufficient organization of content, sufficient and functional depth and accuracy of historical/factual information indicates some use of sources beyond the minimum requirement, sources used effectively	Satisfactory Limited organization of content, partial development of historical/factual detail, and/or superficial nature of depth indicates that a sufficient variety of sources were probably not used	Minimal Achievement Distinct lack of organization, underdeveloped historical/factual detail and insufficient depth indicate an inadequate attempt to use source material effectively	Unsatisfactory Distinctly underdeveloped or incomplete unit guide demonstrates a lack of effort to use even the most basic source material effectively	NOTES: __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________
Formatting \| Neatness Text Elements \| Formatting Elements \| Graphics \| General Appearance	Outstanding Outstanding effort with regard to organizational instructions, formatting instructions followed with meticulous attention to detail, graphics are appropriate and relevant, creativity is evident	Excellent Excellent effort with regard to organizational instructions, formatting instructions followed, graphics are appropriate, relevant, and enhance understanding	High Achievement High level of achievement with regard to organization, formatting instructions followed with sufficient accuracy, neatness and graphics enhance understanding	Satisfactory Satisfactory level of achievement with regard to organization, formatting errors evident, lack of neatness interferes somewhat with understanding, graphics are satisfactory	Minimal Achievement Minimal level of achievement with regard to organization, insufficient attention to formatting instructions, and/or lack of neatness profoundly interferes with understanding	Unsatisfactory Distinctly underdeveloped or incomplete unit guide demonstrates a lack of effort. Meaningful evaluation of formatting and neatness not possible	NOTES: __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________ __________________

Keywords:

Unit Guide | Document Team Evaluation

Subjects:

History

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric