Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Journalism I-IV Editorial Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Journalism I-IV Editorial Rubric
Persuasive Editorial
Rubric Code:
UX42B23
By
RogueScholar
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Journalism
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criterion
Exceptional
5 pts
Advanced
4 pts
Accomplished
3 pts
Developing
2 pts
Emerging
1 pts
Writing Strategies
Exceptional
-Well organized and sequenced.
-Answers the who, what, when, where, and why or how clearly.
-Audience is clearly addressed.
-Maintains a central idea.
Advanced
-Well organized and sequenced.
-Answers the who, what, when, where, and why or how with some clarity and detail.
-Audience is clearly addressed.
-Maintains a central idea.
Accomplished
-Article is organized and makes sense.
-Answers the who, what, when, where, and why or how questions.
-Shows some awareness of audience.
-Stays on the topic.
Developing
-Article makes sense, but lacks organization.
-Answers most of the who, what, when, where, and why or how questions.
-Shows some awareness of audience.
-May wander off topic.
Emerging
-Article is confusing and without a clear purpose.
-May not answer the who, what, when, where, and why or how questions.
-Writer seems unaware of audience.
Organization & Structure
Exceptional
- 1-2 pages which follow the editorial structure.
- Opposing opinion is present and clearly addressed for the reader.
Advanced
- 1 page which follow the editorial structure.
- Paragraph transitions need some improvement.
- Opposing opinion is present and/or addressed.
Accomplished
- Organization and structure are lacking and effect the content.
- Editorial is disjointed and lacks transition of thoughts.
- Less than 1 page, more than 3 paragraphs.
-Lack of opposing argument.
Developing
- Organization and structure are lacking and effect the content.
- Editorial is disjointed and lacks transition of thoughts.
- Less than 3 paragraphs.
-Lack of opposing argument.
Emerging
- Organization and structure are lacking and effect the content.
- Editorial is disjointed and lacks transition of thoughts.
- Less than 2 paragraphs.
-Lack of opposing argument.
Thinking and Inquiry
Exceptional
- Uses planning skills with a high degree of effectiveness.
- Research is evident and a clear transfer of knowledge supports students ideas.
Advanced
- Uses planning skills with considerable effectiveness.
- Research is clear and supports students ideas.
Accomplished
- Uses planning skills with some effectiveness.
- Research is clear and does not support all students ideas.
Developing
- Uses planning skills with some effectiveness.
- Research is unclear and does not supports students ideas.
Emerging
- Uses no planning skills.
- Research is not present
Writing Conventions
Exceptional
-Sentences are well constructed and varied.
-Strong control of grammar.
-No errors in capitalization, usage, punctuation, and spelling.
-Follows writing guidelines.
Advanced
-Sentences are well constructed and varied.
- Strong control of grammar.
-Very few errors in capitalization, usage, punctuation, and spelling.
-Follows writing guidelines.
Accomplished
-Writes using complete sentences.
-Few errors in capitalization, usage, punctuation, and spelling. -Follows writing guidelines.
Developing
-May include some incomplete or run-on sentences.
-Some errors in capitalization, usage, punctuation, and spelling. -Follows most writing guidelines.
Emerging
-Incomplete or run-on sentences throughout.
-Frequent errors in capitalization, usage, punctuation, and spelling. -Follows few or no writing guidelines.
Revisions
Exceptional
-Article has been well revised and there is no need for a third draft and can be published right away.
Advanced
-Article has been well revised and there may be no need for a third draft.
Accomplished
-Article shows that revisions were incorporated.
-There are very few typographical/grammatical errors.
Developing
-Student tried to incorporate some of the the revisions but article still needed more revisions.
Emerging
Student didn't try to incorporate any of the revisions suggested by the editor/adviser.
Subjects:
English
Health
Journalism
Science
Types:
Assignment
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.