Skip to main content

iRubric: Evaluation of a story rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Evaluation of a story

Character Trait Analysis

Rubric Code: UC5AB5

By mkenneylms

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Reading

Grade Levels: 9-12

Character Analysis
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Body Paragraphs 1-3 70 %
Paragraph #1	Excellent Interpretation of the story elements are accurate and based on logical and insightful textual references.	Good Interpretation of the story elements are accurate and based on logical textual references.	Fair Interpretation of the story elements are mostly accurate. Textual references may be based on insufficient textual references.	Poor Interpretation of the story elements are inaccurate and based on random textual references.
Evidence #1	Excellent The evidence strongly and insightfully supports the interpretation. Evidence is clearly stated with textual support.	Good The evidence accurately supports the interpretation, but not always clearly connected to the interpretation with textual support.	Fair The evidence somewhat supports the interpretation and the connection to the interpretation is not always clear or textually supported.	Poor The evidence does not clearly support the interpretation and are random or not included to support the interpretation and there is not textual support.
Paragraph #2	Excellent Interpretation of the story elements are accurate and based on logical and insightful textual references.	Good Interpretation of the story elements are accurate and based on logical textual references.	Fair Interpretation of the story elements are mostly accurate. Textual references may be based on insufficient textual references.	Poor Interpretation of the story elements are inaccurate and based on random textual references.
Evidence #2	Excellent The evidence strongly and insightfully supports the interpretation. Evidence is clearly stated with textual support.	Good The evidence accurately supports the interpretation, but not always clearly connected to the interpretation with textual support.	Fair The evidence somewhat supports the interpretation and the connection to the interpretation is not always clear or textually supported.	Poor The evidence does not clearly support the interpretation and are random or not included to support the interpretation and there is not textual support.
Paragraph #3	Excellent Interpretation of the story elements are accurate and based on logical and insightful textual references.	Good Interpretation of the story elements are accurate and based on logical textual references.	Fair Interpretation of the story elements are mostly accurate. Textual references may be based on insufficient textual references.	Poor Interpretation of the story elements are inaccurate and based on random textual references.
Evidence #3	Excellent The evidence strongly and insightfully supports the interpretation. Evidence is clearly stated with textual support.	Good The evidence accurately supports the interpretation, but not always clearly connected to the interpretation with textual support.	Fair The evidence somewhat supports the interpretation and the connection to the interpretation is not always clear or textually supported.	Poor The evidence does not clearly support the interpretation and are random or not included to support the interpretation and there is not textual support.
Content 15 %
Paragraph #4/Conclusion	Excellent Evaluation of the story is extended beyond explanation through detailed elaboration. All questions are addressed and textual support is provided where applicable.	Good Evaluation of the story is extended through brief elaboration. Most questions are addressed and textual support is provided where applicable.	Fair Evaluation of the story is is not extended beyond the explanation or elaborated upon. Few questions are addressed and little textual support is provided where applicable.	Poor Evaluation of the story is is not extended beyond the explanation or elaborated upon. No questions are addressed and no textual support is provided.
Form 15 %
Mechanics/MLA format	Excellent Fewer than three mechanical errors. All MLA format criteria met.	Good Fewer than five mechanical errors. All MLA format criteria met.	Fair Mechanical errors interfere with effectiveness of paper. MLA format criteria used.	Poor Mechanical errors interfere with readability of paper. Little or no MLA format criteria used.
Works Cited/Planning Sheet	Excellent Work cited is present and accurate. Planning pages are present and complete.	Good Work cited is present and accurate. Planning pages are present, with two pages complete.	Fair Work cited is present and but inaccurate. Planning pages are present, with two pages complete.	Poor Work cited is not present. Planning pages are present, with one pages complete.

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More English rubrics

More Reading rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n224