iRubric: STEM Focused Investigation & Shared Understanding rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

STEM Focused Investigation & Shared Understanding

Biology Science Presentation - Topic Chosen by Student

How well did you set up your investigation and present your findings.

Rubric Code: UA636A

By drgarcia

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: Science

Type: Presentation

Grade Levels: K-5

Project Grade Each portion of your project will be graded using this rubric!
	Below Standard 1 points (N/A)	Approaching Standard 2 points (N/A)	Meeting Standard 3 points (N/A)	Exceeding Standard 4 points (N/A)
Content concepts Wikipedia is not all-knowing! In fact, if Wikipedia is your only source, then you're in trouble!	Below Standard Contains mostly incorrect information.	Approaching Standard Contains some correct information, content comes mostly from one book.	Meeting Standard All information is correct, some content comes from one book, but is mostly from multiple sources.	Exceeding Standard All information is correct, including info not covered in class. Project contains some content from class, but most from multiple sources.
Clarity Easy to understand... A baby could do it... well, your peers could get it!	Below Standard Information is not clearly worded or is missing descriptions. Students would not understand subject, even with in-class knowledge.	Approaching Standard Some parts are clear, others are not, same with descriptions. Students would find it hard understanding concepts, even with in-class knowledge.	Meeting Standard Clear wording, good descriptions. Students would understand with in-class knowledge.	Exceeding Standard Exceptional wording, great descriptions. Students would understand with little to no previous knowledge.
Time Management Use it wisely... I'm watching you!	Below Standard Time was not well-managed. Distractions were frequent and student(s) was/were unable to redirect themselves.	Approaching Standard Some of the time was managed well, but distractions occurred often. Student(s) had a difficult time redirecting themselves & getting back on task.	Meeting Standard Most of the time was managed well, but distractions occurred now and then. Student(s) was able to refocus well.	Exceeding Standard Time was managed well and student(s) was/were always on task. When distractions occurred, student(s) refocused quickly.
Procedure Develops a fair test	Below Standard Simply discover with materials with no focus or guiding questions. Plan is made but not followed/No plan or procedure is made.	Approaching Standard Question is asked and plan created, but not with a fair test (too many variables, no data collection, procedure will not elicit answer/conclusions to original question)	Meeting Standard Fair test created. Observations, recorded data, accurately drawn conclusions.	Exceeding Standard Fair test created. Observations, recorded data, accurately drawn conclusions. Explain WHY or HOW results connect to content.
Presentation Show us what you've got! Do it in a unique way!	Below Standard Presentation is short, lacks organization. No audience involvement. No conclusion. Little/ No eye contact, hard to hear, back facing audience most of the time.	Approaching Standard Presents project, but has poor organization or lacks particular parts. Some eye contact, low volume, shies away from audience.	Meeting Standard Introduces their project, demonstrates it, and has conclusion. Mostly maintains eye contact, good volume, mostly open body language.	Exceeding Standard Excellent eye contact, volume, open body language. Distinctive, dramatic, or unusual in a way that makes audience learn more.

Subjects:

Science

Types:

Discuss this rubric