iRubric: Vietnam comparison project rubric

4) All indicators selected are complimentary and together show an excellent representation of important factors relevant to living conditions in Asia. Indicators are properly quantified and referenced. Rankings correct and scale explained

3.5)All indicators selected are complimentary and together show a very good representation of important factors relevant to living conditions in Asia. Indicators are quantified and referenced. Rankings correct.

3) The majority of indicators selected are complimentary and show a good representation of important factors relevant to living conditions. Some minor errors in quantification referencing and/or ranking

2) Indicators selected, when viewed together show a limited representation of factors relevant to living conditions in Asia. Several major errors in quantification referencing and/or ranking.

1) Indiactors missing or inappropriate. Many data errors obvious. Not referenced well and/or rankings are incorrect or not explained

0

4) Covers a very wide variety of information on the factors in common and different. Info links well to living condition. Linkages explained between factors and living condition in writing

3.5) Covers a good variety of information on the factors in common and different. Info links well to living condition. Linkages mentioned but not explained in detail

3) Covers good information on the factors in common and different. Factors link well to living condition. No linkages made (in writing) between factors and living condition.

2) Covers basic information on the factors in common and different. Factors do not link well to LC links not made in writing

1) Information covered is rudimentary and factors do not link well to living condition .

0

8) 4 maps all with BOLTSS - colour selection is appropraite for choropleth map. Indicators selected to be mapped show an excellent represent of LC. Explanation of relationship shows a thorough understanding of LC in each country.

7) 4 maps all with BOLTSS - colour selection is appropraite for choropleth map. Indicators selected to be mapped show an very good represent of LC. Explanation of relationship shows a good understanding of LC in each country.

6) -5 4 maps some BOLTSS missing - colour selection is appropraite for choropleth map. Indicators selected to be mapped show an good represent of LC. Explanation of relationship shows a basic understanding of LC in each country.

4) 4 maps many BOLTSS missing - colour selection is appropraite for choropleth map. Indicators selected to be mapped show an basic represent of LC. Explanation of relationship shows a basic understanding of LC in each country.

3-1) 3 or less maps with many BOLTSS missing - colours not appropriate for a choropleth map. Indicators selected to be mapped show an basic represent of LC. Explanation of relationship shows a basic understanding of LC in each country or explanation not given.

0

4) Explanation is detailed and insightful showing a thorough understanding of living condition and factors affecting each country. Example and figures are used to quantify and illustrate their understanding

3.5) A very good attempt has been made to explain differences. Explanation shows a very good understanding of Living condition. Limited or no examples

3) Good attempt has been made to explain the differences between countries demonstrating a good understanding of LC etc. No examples/figures used

2) Explanation demonstrates a basic understanding of LC. No examples/figures

1) Explanation does not show sufficient detail and understanding of LC. No examples

0

2) All data used has been properly referenced, all graphs, tables, maps have sources supplied. Excellent variety of reference material used

1.5) All data used has been properly referenced, 90% of graphs, tables, maps have sources supplied. Good variety of reference material used

1) most data used has been properly referenced, 70 % of graphs, tables, maps have sources supplied. More variety of reference material could have been used

0.5) Many pieces of data not referenced correctly, less than 50 % of graphs, tables, maps have sources supplied. Only one or 2 references used.

0