Skip to main content

iRubric: BIO 496: Internship Evaluation rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
BIO 496: Internship Evaluation 
Rubric Code: U56CCW
By sromano
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Biology  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric BIO 496 Internship
  Excellent

4 pts

Very Good

3 pts

Good

2 pts

Fair

1 pts

Comprehension

Excellent

Student demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of their daily activities, using their biology background to investigate the basis for their activities, as well as any career implications of their experience.
Very Good

Student demonstrates an understanding of their daily activities, using at least some biology background to investigate the basis for their activities, as well as any career implications of their experience.
Good

Student demonstrates some understanding of their daily activities but does not fully discuss the biology background that is the basis for their activities, as well as any career implications of their experience.
Fair

Student demonstrates little understanding of their daily activities and does not clearly use their biology background as the basis for investigating their activities, as well as any career implications of their experience.
Weekly summaries

Excellent

Weekly summaries are consistently of high quality, with substantive reflection and description of daily activities and challenges. The summaries are 1) well written with no errors in syntax, spelling, and punctuation, 2) 400-500 words, 3) submitted on time.
Very Good

Weekly summaries are generally of high quality, with reflection and description of daily activities and challenges. Summaries are 1) well written with a few errors in syntax, spelling, and punctuation, 2) 400-500 words, 3) submitted on time.
Good

Weekly summaries are of adequate quality, with some reflection and description of daily activities and challenges. Summaries are 1) generally well written with some errors in syntax, spelling, and punctuation, 2) generally about 400-500 words, 3) generally submitted on time.
Fair

Weekly summaries are of fair quality, with little reflection and description of daily activities and challenges. Summaries are 1) have a number of errors in syntax, spelling, and punctuation, 2) are shorter or longer than the 400-500 word limit, 3)and often not submitted on time.
Response to summaries

Excellent

Summaries included comprehensive responses to the UVI supervisor's queries and comments, including explanations and details.
Very Good

Summaries included responses to the UVI supervisor's queries and comments, including explanations and details.
Good

Summaries included some responses to the UVI supervisor's queries and comments.
Fair

Summaries included few responses to the UVI supervisor's queries and comments.
Final report

Excellent

The final report does an excellent job of synthesizing the weekly reports while including an overall perspective on the internship experience and describing the significance of the internship to the individual in terms of career goals. The report is well written with no errors in syntax, spelling and punctuation and was submitted by the final day of the semester.
Very Good

The final report does a good job of synthesizing the weekly reports while including an overall perspective on the internship experience and its value. The report is well written with a few errors in syntax, spelling and punctuation and was submitted on the final day of the semester.
Good

The final report includes a synthesis of the weekly reports while including some perspective on the internship experience and its value. The report has some errors in syntax, spelling and punctuation and was submitted on the final day of the semester.
Fair

The final report attempts to synthesize the weekly reports but includes little perspective on the internship experience and its value. The report has a number of errors in syntax, spelling and punctuation and was submitted after the final day of the semester.
Supervisor's evaluation

Excellent

The supervisor's evaluation asserts that the student completed all assigned tasks on a timely basis, kept to the agreed upon schedule, and participated fully and actively in the internship experience.
Very Good

The supervisor's evaluation asserts that the student completed most assigned tasks on a timely basis, generally kept to the agreed upon schedule, and participated fully and actively in the internship experience.
Good

The supervisor's evaluation asserts that the student completed some assigned tasks on a timely basis, while having some difficulty keeping to the agreed upon schedule, and participated in the internship experience.
Fair

The supervisor's evaluation asserts that the student did not complete assigned tasks on a timely basis, did not keep to the agreed upon schedule, and participated somewhat in the internship experience.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n243