iRubric: NCSCA SCHOLARSHIP rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

NCSCA SCHOLARSHIP

Crohns & Me Scholarship

Evaluation of scholarship applicants by multiple application readers

Rubric Code: U342AW

By lftaylor

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: (General)

Type: Project

Grade Levels: Graduate

NCSCA Scholarship
	Not Indicated 0 pts	Poor 2 pts	Fair 4 pts	Average 6 pts	Above Average 8 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Essay	Not Indicated Essay not completed	Poor Poor quality writing Content not supportive of essay requirements	Fair Fair quality writing Content complete but unremarkable	Average Average quality writing Content complete Content interesting	Above Average Above average quality writing Content complete Content interesting and descriptive	Excellent Excellent quality writing Content complete Content interesting, descriptive, imaginative and compelling
Academics	Not Indicated Academic information not completed	Poor Transcript indicates one or more failed classes without reasonable explanation No academic honors	Fair Transcript indicates mostly C's and D's without reasonable explanation No academic honors	Average Transcript indicates mostly B's and C's Academic honors such as subject-specific honor society	Above Average Transcript indicates mostly A's and B's Academic honors such as Dean's List, top 10% Academic honors such as subject-specific honor society	Excellent Transcript indicates mostly A's with only the occasional B Academic honors such as Phi Beta Kappa, Valedictorian, Salutatorian, top 5% Academic honors such as Dean's List, top 10% Academic honors such as subject-specific honor society
Recommendation Letters	Not Indicated Letters not complete	Poor Letters show unremarkable support of candidate Letters do not indicate in-depth knowledge of candidate	Fair Letters show support of candidate Letters show understanding of candidate	Average Letters show support of candidate Letters show length and depth of understanding of candidate	Above Average Letters show enthusiastic support of candidate Letters reflect more depth of understanding of candidate than average	Excellent Letters show enthusiastic support of candidate Letters reflect in-depth understanding of candidate Letters provide a deeper understanding of candidate that enhances other submissions
Community Involvement	Not Indicated Community involvement not indicated	Poor 1 example of community involvement	Fair 2 or more examples of community involvement with no unique or leadership roles	Average 2 or more examples of recent community involvement with unique or leadership roles or Lesser involvement explained by circumstances	Above Average Recent and above average community and/or church service or Lesser involvement explained by extreme circumstances (med school, children, etc.)	Excellent Recent, lengthy and outstanding community and/or church service Leadership roles in community involvment

Subjects:

(General)

Types:

Project

Discuss this rubric