iRubric: Wanted Poster rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...

Wanted Poster

Students will create a wanted poster for General Zaroff from "The Most Dangerous Game" (at least 3) including physical descriptions, crime descriptions, where-abouts, allies (If any), aliases, a photo, and any other necessary information to ensure his safe capture.

Rubric Code: U25W95A

By kmayhew

Ready to use

Public Rubric

Subject: English

Type: Reading

Grade Levels: 9-12

Wanted Poster 100 %
	Poor 10 pts	Fair 15 pts	Excellent 20 pts	Comments (N/A)
Name/ Physical Appearance 20 %	Poor Suspect is named, but details about appearance or personality are vague or non- existent.	Fair Suspect is named, and some details about appearance or personality are provided. Missing specific details that are essential to ensuring the suspect can be identified	Excellent Poster contains the suspect's name/alias, as well as a vivid description of the suspect's appearance/personality traits	Comments
Image of Suspect 20 %	Poor Poster does not contain a detailed image of the suspect to match the description provided in the text.	Fair Poster contains some of the major details of the text's description of the suspect (character) but other important features are missing.	Excellent Poster is an excellent depiction of the character as described in the text. Details are accurate and serve to present a vivid image of the suspect(character)	Comments
Crime(s)/ Reward 20 %	Poor Poster does not contain a detailed description of the character's crimes and no reward	Fair Poster contains a vague description of the character's crimes and reward.	Excellent Poster contains a vivid and detailed description of the character's crimes and strong warnings for the public regarding the character's dangerous/murderous tendencies and a fitting reward.	Comments
Last Seen 20 %	Poor Poster does not containing suggested location of the character;	Fair Poster contains a slight suggested location of the character.	Excellent Poster contains detailed suggested location of the character.	Comments
Use of Conventions 20 %	Poor Poor grammar, spelling and punctuation; Lacks evidence of editing an proofreading.	Fair Multiple grammar/spelling/punctuation errors; sloppy work. Further editing and proofreading required.	Excellent Grammar, spelling and punctuation are flawless; Editing and proofreading are clearly evident.	Comments